Key result
Silent ischemia in patients with diabetes linked to ~188% greater MACE risk.
Why the study?
Heart rate recovery after stress testing reflects vagal activity related to premature death, but its prognostic value for adverse events required investigation in diabetic patients.
Does the presence of silent ischemia and slow heart rate recovery predict major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes mellitus?
Does the presence of silent ischemia and slow heart rate recovery predict major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes mellitus?
In patients with diabetes, silent ischemia is a strong predictor of long-term major adverse cardiovascular events, whereas the prognostic value of slow heart rate recovery requires larger studies to confirm.
Silent ischemia was associated with higher MACE risk in diabetes; leaves open heart rate recovery's prognostic value pending larger studies.
Introduction: Heart rate recovery (HRR) after stress testing is an indicator of normal vagal activity which is in relation to the risk of premature death. Therefore, the prognostic value of this parameter for adverse events needs to be investigated, especially in patients with diabetes whose heart innervation is often disturbed. Methods: The research included 112 patients. The patient follow-up was performed via telephone interview. Patients were divided into groups with and without silent ischemia. Four major adverse events (MACE) were investigated: myocardial revascularization, heart failure with hospitalization, heart attack and all-cause death. Median follow up time was 5 years. Results: Patients with silent ischemia had significantly lower HRR compared to patients without it (22.8 ± 10.4 vs. 29.4 ± 13.8 beats per minute, p=0.031). The risk of MACE was significantly higher in patients with silent ischemia compared to patients without it (54.2% vs. 25%, p=0.006), with patients with silent ischemia having 2.88 times higher incidence of MACE during long-term follow-up (HR 2.882; 95% CI 1.449-5.174; p=0.03). The group of patients with slow HRR had almost 2 times higher incidence of MACE during long-term follow-up in comparison to the group of patients with normal HRR (HR 1.918; 95%CI: 0.939-3.916; p=0.074). Conclusion: Patients with diabetes and silent ischemia had significantly higher risk of MACE compared to patients without silent ischemia during long-term follow-up. To determine the importance of HRR in adverse event prediction in patients with silent ischemia, further research is needed with a larger number of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jancic et al. (2023) studied this question. Patients with diabetes and silent ischemia had a 2.88 times higher incidence of MACE compared to those without silent ischemia during a 5-year follow-up (HR 2.882).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: