Key result
Very low-flow state linked to ~81% greater all-cause mortality risk versus normal flow.
Why the study?
LV flow state is linked to poor outcomes in severe aortic stenosis, but its impact on long-term prognosis in populations without valvular disease is poorly defined.
Does a low left ventricular flow state increase the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in asymptomatic individuals without clinical cardiovascular disease?
Cohort (n=4,398)
Does a low left ventricular flow state increase the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in asymptomatic individuals without clinical cardiovascular disease?
In an asymptomatic population without clinical cardiovascular disease, a very low left ventricular flow state (SVi <30 ml/m2) assessed by CMR is an independent predictor of long-term all-cause mortality.
VLFS may flag higher mortality risk in asymptomatic adults; leaves open whether CMR flow assessment refines primary prevention beyond standard factors.
Left ventricular (LV) flow state is associated with unfavorable outcome in patient with severe aortic stenosis. However, there is little information on its impact on long-term prognosis in a population without valvular disease. To examine the impact of LFS on all-cause mortality in multi-ethnic population we analyzed 4398 asymptomatic participants without clinical cardiovascular disease undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. LV stroke volume index (SVi), LVEF and myocardial contraction fraction (MCF) were measured. LV flow states were classified as normal flow state (NFS, SVi >35 ml/m 2 ), low-flow state (LFS, 30-34 ml/m 2 ) and very low-flow state (VLFS: SVi <30 ml/m 2 ). Clinical data were collected at enrollment. Participants were followed up for a median of 14.2 years. All-cause and cardiovascular disease mortalities were used as primary endpoints. All-cause mortality was 16.2% and cardiovascular disease mortality 3.5%. VLFS and LFS groups had more cardiovascular risk factors and lower cardiac performance than NFS. The relationship between all-cause mortality and SVi was “L-shape with the “breakpoint” at 33.5ml/m2 for a statistical significance (p=0.009). All-cause mortality was significantly associated with LFS after adjusted for age, sex, LVEF, and LV mass index with hazard ratio (HR) 1.81, 95% CI: 1.31-2.49 for VLF and HR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.95-1.54 for LFS with overall p value 0.001). The highest cardiovascular disease mortality was seen in VLFS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Asymptomatic without clinical cardiovascular disease (n=4,398). Very low-flow state (VLFS) and low-flow state (LFS) vs. Normal flow state (NFS) was evaluated on All-cause and cardiovascular disease mortalities (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.31-2.49, p=0.001). Very low-flow state was significantly associated with increased all-cause mortality compared to normal flow state (HR 1.81; 95% CI 1.31-2.49; P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: