Key result
LVEF 50-59% is linked to ~80% higher death or HF risk versus ≥60% in normal-flow low-gradient AS.
Why the study?
The prognostic impact of left ventricular ejection fraction remains incompletely understood across various hemodynamic subtypes of severe aortic stenosis.
Does baseline LVEF <60% increase the risk of death or heart failure hospitalization in patients with severe aortic stenosis across different flow-gradient patterns?
Cohort (n=3,363)
Does baseline LVEF <60% increase the risk of death or heart failure hospitalization in patients with severe aortic stenosis across different flow-gradient patterns?
Hazard Ratio: 1.8 (95% CI 1.35–2.4)
p-value: p=<0.001
LVEF provides important prognostic stratification in severe aortic stenosis, demonstrating that patients with LVEF 50-59% have a significantly higher risk of death or heart failure hospitalization compared to those with LVEF ≥60%, particularly in normal-flow low-gradient and high-gradient phenotypes.
LVEF 50-59% flags higher risk in low-gradient AS with normal flow; leaves open whether mid-range LVEF warrants distinct management.
Background Current guidelines classify normal‐flow low‐gradient (LG) aortic stenosis (AS) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50% as “moderate.” However, the prognostic impact of LVEF remains incompletely understood across various hemodynamic subtypes of AS. Methods We analyzed 3363 consecutive patients with severe AS from the CURRENT AS Registry‐2 (Contemporary Outcomes After Surgery and Medical Treatment in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis). Patients were classified into LG AS with normal flow (N=1005), and LG AS with low flow (N=372), and high‐gradient AS (N=1986). Patients were further divided according to baseline LVEF: <50%, 50% to 59%, and ≥60%. The primary outcome measure was a composite of death or heart failure hospitalization. Within each hemodynamic subtype, clinical outcomes were compared across baseline LVEF categories of <50%, 50% to 59%, and ≥60% (reference), and unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. The median follow‐up period in the entire cohort was 763 days. Results LVEF <50% was associated with a greater hazard of death or heart failure hospitalization than LVEF ≥60% in all 3 subtypes of AS. LVEF 50% to 59% was associated with a greater hazard of death or heart failure hospitalization than LVEF ≥60% in LG AS with normal flow (aHR, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.35–2.40], P <0.001) and high‐gradient AS (aHR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.13–1.79], P =0.003) with hazards comparable to those with LVEF <50% but not in LG AS with low flow (aHR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.72–1.79], P =0.59). Conclusions These findings suggest that LVEF may provide additional prognostic stratification within severe AS phenotypes, particularly in normal‐flow LG AS. Registration URL: https://center6.umin.ac.jp ; Unique Identifier: UMIN000034169.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taniguchi et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic stenosis (n=3,363). Baseline LVEF 50% to 59% vs. Baseline LVEF ≥60% was evaluated on Composite of death or heart failure hospitalization (aHR 1.80, 95% CI 1.35-2.40, p=<0.001). In normal-flow low-gradient severe aortic stenosis, LVEF 50-59% was associated with a higher risk of death or heart failure hospitalization than LVEF ≥60% (aHR 1.80; 95% CI 1.35-2.40; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: