PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026European Heart Journal0 citations

Prognostic relevance of gradient and flow status in severe aortic stenosis

View Full Paper
EOE Pozo OsinaldeHospital Clínico San CarlosJDJ R Bravo DominguezHospital Clínico San CarlosLFL De Lara FuentesHospital Clínico San Carlos

Key Result

Paradoxical low-flow low-gradient severe aortic stenosis had higher mortality (32.4% vs 15.9%, p=0.049) despite similar intervention rates at 1 year.

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the impact of different aortic stenosis patterns on major clinical events.
  • Conducted a retrospective observational study at a tertiary hospital in 2021.
  • Patients diagnosed with severe aortic stenosis were classified into four categories based on echocardiographic measurements.
  • Collected data on baseline characteristics and clinical events over a 1-year follow-up.
  • Used statistical tests like Student t test or ANOVA to assess associations.
  • 205 patients included, with various flow patterns identified: 67.3% high gradient, 19.8% PLF-LG.
  • 24.8% of patients were admitted for heart failure during follow-up.
  • 68.3% underwent valve replacement, with 51.7% receiving TAVR.
  • PLF-LG was linked to higher mortality (32.4% vs. 15.9%) compared to other patterns.

Structured PICO

Does paradoxical low-flow low-gradient pattern increase mortality compared to high gradient pattern in patients with severe aortic stenosis?

P
Population
205 consecutive patients diagnosed with severe aortic stenosis at a tertiary hospital center, mean age 81±10 years, 52.7% female.
I
Intervention
Paradoxical low-flow low-gradient (PLF-LG) severe aortic stenosis pattern
C
Comparator
High gradient (HG) severe aortic stenosis pattern
O
Outcome
Major clinical events (heart failure admission, intervention and death) at 1 year follow-uphard clinical

Paradoxical low-flow low-gradient severe aortic stenosis is associated with higher mortality than high-gradient severe AS, suggesting that intervention should not be delayed in these patients.

Abstract

Abstract Background Severe aortic stenosis (AS) may be presented with different flow, gradient and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) patterns. Paradoxical low-flow low-gradient (PLF-LG) severe AS has an specific clinical profile but prognosis and management remains controversial. Purpose Our aim is to evaluate impact of different AS patterns in major clinical events appearance. Methods A retrospective observational study was carried out on all the consecutive patients diagnosed with severe AS at our tertiary hospital centre during 2021. Echocardiographic measurements were carefully reviewed and patients were classified following current guidelines into four categories: high gradient (HG), concordant low-flow low-gradient (CLF-LG), paradoxical low-flow low-gradient (PLF-LG), and normal-flow low-gradient (NF-LG). Baseline characteristics and clinical events (heart failure admission, intervention and death) at 1 year follow-up were collected from medical records. Association between categories and events was established with Student t test or ANOVA as required. Results 205 patients with severe AS were included in the study (81±10 years old, 52.7% female). Category distribution was as follows: HG (138, 67,3%), PLF-LG (34, 19,8%), CLF-LG (21, 10,2%), NF-LG (12, 5,9%). During the follow-up 24.8% were admitted due to heart failure, 68,3% got valve replacement (51,7% TAVR), and 22% died. Severe tricuspid regurgitation was more frequent in PLF-LG than in HG AS (14.7% vs 2.2%; p0.01). Despite no differences in intervention rate, more patients with PLF-LG (32.4% vs 15.9%; p = 0.049) died during the evolution. Conclusions PLF-LG pattern was the second most common pattern of severe AS in our cohort and it was related to a higher mortality with no differences in intervention rate. Thus, the intervention in this entity should not be delayed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Osinalde et al. (2025) studied this question. Paradoxical low-flow low-gradient severe aortic stenosis had higher mortality (32.4% vs 15.9%, p=0.049) despite similar intervention rates at 1 year.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828410fc35cd7a8847a2chttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.2331
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper