PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 21, 2026Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Prognostic impact of baseline left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion after successful percutaneous coronary intervention or medical therapy: A prospective cohort study

YKYong Hoon KimAHAe-Young HerSRSeung-Woon Rha

Key Result

Reduced LVEF (≤40%) in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion was associated with higher 3-year all-cause mortality compared to mildly reduced (P=0.004) and preserved LVEF (P<0.001).

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess how different levels of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) affect long-term outcomes in coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) patients.
  • Retrospective analysis of 1255 patients with coronary CTO categorized by LVEF levels.
  • Groups based on LVEF: reduced (rEF, ≤40%), mildly reduced (mrEF, 41–49%), and preserved (pEF, ≥50%).
  • Primary outcome focused on all-cause mortality and secondary outcomes on cardiac-related events.
  • rEF patients had significantly higher all-cause mortality and cardiac death compared to mrEF and pEF groups.
  • mrEF patients had higher rates of any revascularization compared to pEF, indicating a higher likelihood of interventions.
  • Differences in mortality and revascularization rates were consistent among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=1,255)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does baseline LVEF category impact 3-year clinical outcomes in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion?

P
Population
1,255 patients with coronary chronic total occlusion, categorized by baseline left ventricular ejection fraction and evaluated for 3-year clinical outcomes.
E
Exposure
Reduced LVEF (≤40%) or mildly reduced LVEF (41-49%)
C
Comparator
Preserved LVEF (≥50%)
O
Outcome
All-cause mortality at 3 yearshard clinical

In patients with coronary chronic total occlusion, reduced LVEF (≤40%) is associated with higher all-cause mortality compared to mildly reduced or preserved LVEF, while mildly reduced LVEF is associated with higher revascularization rates than preserved LVEF.

Main Result

p-value: p=0.004 and <0.001

Limitations

  • Single-center study
  • Retrospective analysis
  • single-center study
  • retrospective analysis

Abstract

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a key determinant of prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease. However, the impact of LVEF categories on long-term outcomes in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the 3-year clinical outcomes in CTO patients according to LVEF category. We retrospectively analyzed 1255 patients with coronary CTO, categorized into 3 groups based on LVEF: reduced (rEF, ≤40%), mildly reduced (mrEF, 41–49%), and preserved (pEF, ≥50%). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included cardiac death (CD), non-CD, myocardial infarction, and any revascularization, including target lesion revascularization (CTO vessels), target vessel revascularization (TVR and CTO vessels), and nontarget vessel revascularization (non-TVR and non-CTO vessels). After adjustment, all-cause mortality ( P = .004 and P < .001, respectively) and CD ( P = .005 and P < .001, respectively) were significantly higher in the rEF group compared with the mrEF and pEF groups. The mrEF group had significantly higher rates of any revascularization ( P < .001), target lesion revascularization (CTO vessel, P = .024), and TVR (CTO vessel, P = .001) than the pEF group. These findings remained consistent even when the analysis was confined to patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. In this single-center study of patients with coronary CTO, all-cause mortality was higher in the rEF group than in the mrEF and pEF groups, whereas no significant difference was observed between the mrEF and pEF groups. However, the mrEF group had a higher rate of any revascularization than the pEF group.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kim et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in coronary chronic total occlusion (n=1,255). Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (rEF, ≤40%) vs. Mildly reduced (41-49%) and preserved (≥50%) LVEF was evaluated on all-cause mortality (p=0.004 and <0.001). Reduced LVEF (≤40%) in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion was associated with higher 3-year all-cause mortality compared to mildly reduced (P=0.004) and preserved LVEF (P<0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/69706ce9b6488063ad5c1b7bhttps://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000047215
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper