Key result
Left bundle branch block is present in approximately 25% of heart failure patients and may contribute to the progression to heart failure through intra-ventricular asynchrony.
Why the study?
Does left bundle branch block have a causative role in the progression to heart failure?
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
LBBB may contribute to HF progression via dyssynchrony; leaves open whether targeting conduction delay alters outcomes in prospective trials.
The prevalence of conduction disturbances, particularly left bundle branch block (LBBB), is strongly correlated with age and with the presence of cardiovascular disease. LBBB has been reported to affect approximately 25% of the heart failure (HF) population and it is likely that the deleterious role of such conduction disorders in the progression to HF has been underestimated. The purpose of this article is to review the data from the literature indicating that LBBB may have a causative role, mediated through the resulting intra‐ventricular asynchrony, in the deterioration of cardiac function and the development of cardiac remodelling and HF. It also aims to address the potential for future clinical therapies for this conduction disorder.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zannad et al. (2006) studied this question. Left bundle branch block is present in approximately 25% of heart failure patients and may contribute to the progression to heart failure through intra-ventricular asynchrony.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: