Key result
CRT reverses the baseline septal-lateral difference in mid-segmental peak strain.
Why the study?
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve regional myocardial strain distribution in patients with symptomatic systolic heart failure and LBBB?
Population
18 patients with symptomatic systolic heart failure and left bundle branch block, mean age 65 +/- 11 years…
Comparison
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) vs Baseline (before CRT)
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
Cardiac resynchronization therapy reverses the abnormal myocardial fiber strain distribution seen in patients with systolic heart failure and LBBB, suggesting strain imaging could aid in patient selection.
Observational (n=18)
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve regional myocardial strain distribution in patients with symptomatic systolic heart failure and LBBB?
p-value: p=<0.05
Cardiac resynchronization therapy reverses the abnormal myocardial fiber strain distribution seen in patients with systolic heart failure and LBBB, suggesting strain imaging could aid in patient selection.
Breithardt et al. (2003) conducted an observational in symptomatic systolic heart failure and left bundle branch block (n=18). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) vs. Before CRT (baseline) was evaluated on septal-lateral difference in mid-segmental peak strain (p=<0.05). Cardiac resynchronization therapy reversed the septal-lateral difference in mid-segmental peak strain from -46 ms at baseline to 17 ms during therapy (p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: