Why the study?
The prognostic value of LBBB septal strain patterns in patients receiving CRT or conservative medical therapy, and their interaction with myocardial scar, remains underexplored.
Does LBBB strain staging predict volumetric response and survival benefit in patients receiving CRT compared to conservative treatment?
Does LBBB strain staging predict volumetric response and survival benefit in patients receiving CRT compared to conservative treatment?
LBBB strain staging independently predicts volumetric response and survival in CRT patients, providing a framework to identify patients who derive the greatest benefit from CRT compared to conservative management.
Should not yet change CRT selection; leaves open whether LBBB strain stages can identify patients who gain little from implant.
AIMS: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) septal strain patterns are associated with left ventricular (LV) reverse remodelling after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, their prognostic value and impact in patients undergoing CRT, as well as in CRT-eligible patients receiving conservative treatment, remains underexplored. This study aimed to validate the prognostic significance of LBBB strain patterns and elucidate the mechanisms underlying CRT response by evaluating their interaction with myocardial scar and clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multicentre study, 267 CRT patients underwent pre-implantation speckle-tracking strain analysis, with 155 also undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. CRT-treated patients were compared with 116 CRT-eligible conservatively treated patients. LBBB septal strain curves were categorized into five stages (LBBB-0 to LBBB-4). Endpoints included all-cause mortality, heart transplantation, and volumetric response in CRT recipients.CRT outcomes showed a stepwise improvement across LBBB stages in volumetric response (P < 0.001) and survival (log-rank P = 0.002). Myocardial scar, present in 52% of CRT patients, inversely correlated with LBBB stages (P = 0.003). After multivariable adjustment, LBBB stages independently predicted volumetric response (OR 2.30, P < 0.001) and survival (HR 0.64, P = 0.038), while scar burden did not. Survival benefits were greater in CRT-treated patients than in conservatively treated patients, ranging from HR 1.42 (P = 0.436) in LBBB-0 to HR 16.49 (P < 0.001) in LBBB-4. CONCLUSION: LBBB strain stages independently predict CRT outcomes, with lower stages associated with attenuated benefits, possibly due to higher scar burden. This classification provides a framework for understanding LBBB pathophysiology and CRT response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duchenne et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: