PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 2, 2004Circulation588 citationsOpen Access

Characterization of Left Ventricular Activation in Patients With Heart Failure and Left Bundle-Branch Block

View Full Paper
AAAngelo AuricchioCFCecilia FantoniFRFrançois Regoli

Key Result

A U-shaped conduction pattern in LV activation is influenced by a line of block, with functional block assessment enhanced by noncontact mapping in heart failure patients with LBBB.

Key Points

  • This research aims to characterize both the activation sequences and patterns in the left ventricle of patients with heart failure and left bundle-branch block.
  • Evaluated LV activation sequences using both 3D contact and noncontact mapping techniques.
  • Involved 24 patients with heart failure and LBBB morphology during intrinsic rhythm and asynchronous pacing.
  • Examined transseptal activation time and endocardial activation time during the analysis.
  • One-third of patients exhibited normal transseptal activation time despite LBBB morphology.
  • Patients with a lateral line of block showed significantly shorter QRS durations (P < 0.003) and transseptal durations (P < 0.001).
  • Functional lines of block shifted during asynchronous ventricular pacing, indicating variable conduction behavior.

Structured PICO

P
Population
24 consecutive patients with moderate to severe HF, LV ejection fraction ≤35%, and dilated cardiomyopathy with LBBB QRS morphology
I
Intervention
Simultaneous 3D contact and noncontact mapping during intrinsic rhythm and asynchronous pacing
O
Outcome
Left ventricular activation sequences (transseptal activation time, LV endocardial activation time, and location of line of block)surrogate

3D noncontact mapping reveals a functional, U-shaped transmural line of block in the left ventricle of HF patients with LBBB, which can be altered by pacing and may help target optimal sites for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Limitations

  • Apart from electrical data, no physically independent morphological or structural information was collected in the LV.

Abstract

Background— Conventional activation mapping in the dilated human left ventricle (LV) with left bundle-branch block (LBBB) morphology is incomplete given the limited number of recording sites that may be collected in a reasonable time and given the lack of precision in marking specific anatomic locations. Methods and Results— We studied LV activation sequences in 24 patients with heart failure and LBBB QRS morphology with simultaneous application of 3D contact and noncontact mapping during intrinsic rhythm and asynchronous pacing. Approximately one third of the patients with typical LBBB QRS morphology had normal transseptal activation time and a slightly prolonged or near-normal LV endocardial activation time. A “U-shaped” activation wave front was present in 23 patients because of a line of block that was located anteriorly (n=12), laterally (n=8), and inferiorly (n=3). Patients with a lateral line of block had significantly shorter QRS ( P <0.003) and transseptal durations ( P <0.001) and a longer distance from the LV breakthrough site to line of block ( P <0.03). Functional behavior of the line of block was demonstrated by a change in its location during asynchronous ventricular pacing at different sites and cycle lengths. Conclusions— A U-shaped conduction pattern is imposed on the LV activation sequence by a transmural functional line of block located between the LV septum and the lateral wall with a prolonged activation time. Assessment of functional block is facilitated by noncontact mapping, which may be useful for identifying and targeting specific locations that are optimal for successful cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Auricchio et al. (2004) studied this question. A U-shaped conduction pattern in LV activation is influenced by a line of block, with functional block assessment enhanced by noncontact mapping in heart failure patients with LBBB.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6970eb032d1b404414ca79bchttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000118502.91105.f6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper