Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case report describes recurrent cranial neuropathy in a patient mistaken for tuberculosis, suggesting the need for proper diagnostics.
Introduction Sarcoidosis is defined as an immune-mediated disorder characterised by granulomatous inflammation of affected organs. Neurosarcoidosis is demographically reported in 5%–10% of all patients with primary sarcoidosis. A similar genetic mechanism for inflammation compared to active systemic tuberculosis suggests that identical inflammatory pathways are acting in both tuberculosis and sarcoidosis. Case Report We, hereby, report a case of recurrent cranial nerve neuropathy, which was falsely diagnosed as tuberculosis, and the diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis was masked for more than a year. Conclusion Any case with recurrent cranial nerve involvement, bilateral lymphadenopathy with multi-system involvement and a history of steroid-dependent resolution of symptoms must be primarily evaluated for sarcoidosis with histological evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sahoo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: