Demonstrates early elevations in donor-derived cell-free DNA increase the risk of rejection in kidney transplant recipients, suggesting the need for closer monitoring.
Background. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a marker of the presence and severity of injury in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). The impact of early elevations in dd-cfDNA on long-term outcomes remains unclear. Methods. We included all KTR from February 2019 to March 2022 with dd-cfDNA (AlloSure) surveillance and without rejection or graft failure in the first 90 d posttransplant. Participants were stratified into groups based on the highest dd-cfDNA in the first 90 d: <0.5%, 0.5% to <1%, or ≥1%. Outcomes included graft dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min), de novo donor-specific antibodies, biopsy-proven acute rejection, death, and graft failure, over the following 2 y. Results. A total of 255 KTR were analyzed. Sixty (23.5%) had their highest dd-cfDNA result between 0.5% and 1%, and 16 (6.3%) were ≥1.0%. Participants with elevated dd-cfDNA had significantly lower freedom from rejection (<0.5% = 94.0%, 0.5% to <1% = 86.2%, ≥1% = 66.7%; P = 0.001) and trended toward lower freedom from graft dysfunction (<0.5% = 54.9%, 0.5% to <1% = 49.2%, ≥1% = 31.3%; P = 0.122) over the subsequent 2 y. The hazard ratio of a step up between 2 of the 3 groups was 2.12 (95% confidence interval, 1.18-3.81; P = 0.01) for rejection and 1.17 (95% confidence interval, 0.88-1.56; P = 0.29) for graft dysfunction. The groups had similar freedom from de novo donor-specific antibody, graft failure, or death. Conclusions. Our data demonstrate that early elevations in dd-cfDNA are associated with an increased risk of rejection and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate in KTR. As dd-cfDNA is a leading indicator of injury, surveillance may add prognostic value beyond biopsy alone and identify patients at risk who warrant closer monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parajuli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: