Evaluates fat-free mass prediction equations using air-displacement plethysmography in an Eastern European population, suggesting population-specific equations are necessary.
Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a widely used and an easy-to-apply method for determining body composition. However, its accuracy depends on population-specific equations. The aim of the present study is to identify the most appropriate fat-free mass (FFM) prediction equation for an Eastern European population using air-displacement plethysmography (ADP) as the reference method. The study group included 101 Caucasian subjects (56 women and 45 men) with an average body mass index (BMI) of 25.37 ± 5.45 kg/m2. One set of FFMBIA values was automatically calculated with the analyzer (Maltron BioScan 920-2), and four others were computed using the published equations of Kyle, Kanellakis, Heitman, and Deurenberg. The results were compared to FFMADP values measured using a BOD POD Gold Standard Body Composition Tracking System by Bland–Altman analysis. The smallest bias was obtained with the equation by Deurenberg, which underestimated FFM by only −0.22 ± 4.52 kg. The largest bias was obtained with the equation by Kyle (5.92 ± 4.73 kg), followed by the formula of Kanellakis (3.04 ± 4.65 kg). The equations by Heitman and the Maltron inbuilt formula overestimated FFM by 2.15 ± 4.27 kg and, respectively, 1.95 ± 4.3 kg. Although Maltron’s automatically generated values were very strongly correlated with ADP results (CCC = 0.93, SEE = 4.7), the formula by Deurenberg provided the most reliable estimates in the studied population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Creţescu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: