Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis demonstrates a new equation for estimating skeletal muscle mass using BIA and DXA, indicating improved accuracy over previous methods.
The development of appropriate bioimpedance-based equations for assessing body composition requires high-standard reference methods. Conversion factors have been proposed to derive skeletal muscle mass (SMM) from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) outputs. The objective of this study was to present a predictive equation for estimating SMM starting from bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and using DXA as criterion. A total of 228 men and 125 women, aged 18-82 years underwent foot-to-hand BIA at a single frequency, alongside DXA scanning. To develop the new equation, bioelectrical parameters were recorded for 2/3 of the total sample and computed in a stepwise regression analysis. Agreement analyses were conducted on the remaining 1/3 of the sample assessing the performance of the new and a previously published equation (Janssen). The best developed model was: SMM (kg) = -17.612 + (sex × 3.397) + (stature2/reactance × 0.037) + (phase angle × 3.509) - (age × 0.052) with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.88 and standard error of estimation of 2.25 kg, where sex is 0 for women and 1 for men. Agreement analysis revealed no significant mean bias (-0.01) for the new model, whereas the Janssen equation overestimated SMM (+3.65 kg), with 95 % limits of agreement of -4.2 to 4.2 and -0.1 to 8.0, respectively. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient indicated higher accuracy for the new equations compared to the Janssen equation. This study presents a novel BIA-based predictive equation for assessing SMM in male and female individuals, based on sex, reactance, phase angle, and age.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Campa et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: