PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026Children2 citationsOpen Access

Non-Invasive Surfactant Administration in Preterm Infants

View Full Paper
FBFaten BudajajaNLNadine LahageIHIvan Hand

Key Points

  • Evaluate non-invasive surfactant delivery techniques for managing respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants.
  • Literature review of non-invasive surfactant methods
  • Focused on techniques: InSurE, LISA, SALSA/LMA, pharyngeal administration, nebulized surfactant
  • Compared outcomes including mechanical ventilation need, BPD incidence, and complications
  • Non-invasive methods linked to reduced mechanical ventilation needs
  • Lower rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia observed compared to traditional methods
  • LISA/MIST showed the strongest evidence for effectiveness
  • Limited data on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes across all techniques

Abstract

Background: Although surfactant replacement therapy has been a cornerstone of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) management for decades, traditional delivery via endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation is associated with procedure-related complications and increased risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). These concerns have driven the development of less invasive surfactant administration strategies. Objective: This review aims to summarize and evaluate the current literature on less invasive surfactant delivery techniques used in preterm infants with RDS, with a focus on their feasibility, efficacy, and short- and long-term neonatal outcomes. Methods: We reviewed the available literature evaluating less invasive surfactant administration methods, including InSurE, Less Invasive Surfactant Therapy/Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy (LISA/MIST), surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway (SALSA/LMA), pharyngeal administration, and nebulized surfactant. We compared major outcomes, namely the need for mechanical ventilation, incidence of BPD, procedural complications and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. Results: Non-invasive surfactant administration techniques have been associated with reduced exposure to mechanical ventilation and lower rates of BPD compared with conventional approaches. Studies on LISA/MIST demonstrate the most consistent evidence in reducing the need for mechanical ventilation and BPD, while other techniques such as LMA-assisted delivery and nebulization show promise but remain limited by device constraints, gestational age applicability, and heterogeneous study designs. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome data remain sparse across all techniques. Conclusions: Non-invasive surfactant administration represents an important advancement in the management of RDS. While several techniques offer potential advantages over traditional intubation-based delivery, further high-quality studies are required to optimize patient selection, standardize techniques, develop safe and effective delivery devices, and evaluate long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Budajaja et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69730f78c8125b09b0d1f426https://doi.org/10.3390/children13010150
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper