Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mixed methods evaluate arm-hand activity limitations in stroke patients, suggesting effective treatment strategies.
Objective: Post-stroke limitations in arm–hand activities are prevalent, yet a system for categorizing these limitations like the Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC) is lacking. The Arm-Hand-Activities-Scale (AHAS) was developed and psychometric properties of this classification were investigated. Design: Mixed methods to examine comprehensibility, inter-rater reliability, correlations with the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) and the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and sensitivity to change. Subjects/Patients: 76 professionals answered a comprehensibility questionnaire and 85 professionals an inter-rater reliability questionnaire. Methods: For comprehensibility and inter-rater reliability, standardized video sequences of each category were assessed. Cut-off values were identified by comparing the AHAS categories with the FMA (n = 10) and the ARAT (n = 71). For sensitivity-to-change studies, 71 stroke patients were followed for 4 weeks of inpatient rehabilitation. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to examine the relationship between AHAS, FMA, and ARAT outcomes. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was applied for sensitivity to change. Results: The results on comprehensibility of the AHAS categories and the FMA cutoff values were highly consistent. Inter-rater reliability was good to excellent. A significant and strong correlation was found between ARAT and AHAS. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for sensitivity to change was also significant. Conclusion: The AHAS provides a quick and simple classification system to assess the severity of arm–hand activity limitations after stroke This may help in selecting appropriate treatment strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hebenstreit et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: