Key result
Non-invasive CFD-based FFR strongly agrees with invasive measurements with ~8% mean relative error.
Why the study?
Accurate and non-invasive quantification of coronary hemodynamics in the RCA is essential for decision-making but remains challenging due to vessel geometry, pulsatile flow, and blood rheology.
Does a novel computational fluid dynamics framework accurately estimate FFR in right coronary arteries compared to invasive measurements?
Population
Seven patient-specific cases
Comparison
Non-invasive FFR estimation vs invasive wire-based measurements and commercial HeartFlow outputs
Design
Computational validation study
Authors
Loading...
May support accessible open-source FFR estimation in RCA; leaves open larger prospective validation before clinical use.
Does a novel computational fluid dynamics framework accurately estimate FFR in right coronary arteries compared to invasive measurements?
A novel, open-source computational fluid dynamics framework can accurately estimate FFR in right coronary arteries from CCTA with diagnostic consistency similar to commercial software.
Oliveira et al. (2026) studied this question. The CFD-based non-invasive FFR estimation showed strong agreement with invasive measurements, with a mean relative error of 8.4% ± 6.3% in seven patient cases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: