Experimental study quantifies mechanical properties in cemented granular materials, suggesting optimal cement use for stability.
Cemented granular materials (CGMs) represent a transitional class of geomaterials where mechanical behavior is governed by the interplay between a discrete granular skeleton and a continuous cementitious matrix. While previous studies have focused on idealized spherical particles, this study aims to quantify the influence of the cement filling ratio (ranging from 10% to 100%) on the mechanical constitutive behavior of CGMs fabricated with large, irregular granitic aggregates (14–20 mm). Unconfined compressive tests and splitting tensile tests were conducted to evaluate the evolution of strength, stiffness, and failure modes. The results reveal a distinct mechanical transition governed by the cement filling ratio (ρm). The elastic modulus and splitting tensile strength exhibited a linear increase with ρm (R2 > 0.95), indicating a direct dependence on the volume fraction of the binding phase. In contrast, the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and peak strain displayed a bilinear growth pattern with a critical inflection point at ρm = 80%. For the specific irregular granitic aggregate skeleton investigated, this threshold marks the transition from contact-dominated stability to matrix-dominated continuum behavior. Below this threshold, strength gain is limited by the stability of discrete particle contacts; above 80%, the material behaves as a continuum, with UCS increasing rapidly to a maximum of 41.78 MPa at 100% filling. Furthermore, the dispersion of stress–strain responses significantly decreased as ρm exceeded 50%, attributed to the homogenization of stress distribution within the specimen. These findings provide a quantitative basis for optimizing cement usage in ground reinforcement applications, identifying 80% as a critical design threshold.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: