Randomized crossover study assesses bioequivalence of metformin/empagliflozin formulations in healthy individuals, indicating safety and effectiveness under different conditions.
This study evaluated the bioequivalence and safety of two fixed‐dose combination (FDC) tablet formulations of metformin/empagliflozin (1000 mg/5 mg) in healthy Chinese subjects. A single‐center, open‐label, randomized, two‐period, two‐treatment, and two‐sequence crossover study was conducted, enrolling 56 subjects who were assigned to either fasting or fed conditions in a 1:1 ratio. Each subject received both the test and reference formulations, with a 7‐day washout period between administrations. Blood samples were collected up to 48 h post‐dose, and plasma concentrations of metformin and empagliflozin were determined using a validated liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐MS/MS) method. Bioequivalence was assessed based on key pharmacokinetic parameters—C max , AUC 0–t , and AUC 0–∞ —with the geometric least‐squares mean ratios of the test to reference formulation falling within the accepted bioequivalence range of 80.00% to 125.00% for all 90% confidence intervals under both fasting and fed states. High‐fat meals significantly reduced the C max of metformin and empagliflozin by approximately 47% and 28%, respectively, and their overall exposure (AUC 0−∞ ) by approximately 29% and 15%, respectively. No serious adverse events were reported. In conclusion, the test and reference formulations of metformin/empagliflozin FDC tablets were bioequivalent and well‐tolerated under both fasting and fed conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: