This preprint introduces a theory explaining why credentialing systems cannot guarantee mastery, suggesting structural limitations.
This preprint introduces Certification & Credential Collapse Theory (CCCT), a meta-theoretical account of why credentialing systems are structurally incapable of guaranteeing mastery. CCCT shows that, independent of implementation quality, credentials fail to satisfy three necessary conditions for mastery inference—identifiability, validity beyond constrained test conditions, and longitudinal persistence—leading to systematic epistemic limits. The theory derives institutional corollaries explaining credential inflation, proxy drift, and the substitution of administrative legibility for epistemic validity, while clarifying that credentials retain procedural and signaling utility despite lacking mastery-guaranteeing authority.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murad Ahmadov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: