Key result
Hospital wake-up stroke protocols linked to higher thrombolytic eligibility and fewer stroke admissions.
Why the study?
When triaging ischemic stroke patients with unknown onset time (wake-up stroke), concerns regarding thrombolytic therapy eligibility arise despite advanced treatment options.
There is significant variability in the use of wake-up stroke protocols among hospitals, with smaller hospitals paradoxically more likely to endorse a protocol than larger Comprehensive Stroke Centers.
Introduction: Advanced treatment options now exist that are available for some ischemic strokes who arrive with unknown onset time; commonly called wake-up stroke (W-S). When triaging these patients with W-S, concerns regarding thrombolytic therapy eligibility arise due to unknown onset time. We analyzed current hospital level practices and thrombolytic treatment considerations for W-S stroke in in Texas (TX) and Louisiana (LA) with high prevalence of acute ischemic stroke. Methods: Potential hospitals included stroke centers identified affiliated with a research consortium in Texas (TX), or as affiliated with a health system in Louisiana (LA). This data included hospitals characteristics, structural capacity and annual metrics, and current procedures for W-S patients at these institutions. Additionally, via the survey, the hospital’s stroke team was assessed on their knowledge regarding W-S. The survey was developed by a multidisciplinary collaborative of stroke specialists and hosted on a REDCap platform. Data analysis was completed using SAS v9.4. Results: Data were received from 54 (98.2%) of 55 hospitals contacted in LA (29) and TX (25). Survey responses were collected between 9/1/2024 and 3/31/2025. The 39 (72.2%) hospitals that reported using a standardized W-S protocol included all 29 health system hospitals in LA, and 10 hospitals in TX. 48 (96.0%) stated less than ¼ of patients received thrombolytics for W-S. Hospitals with a wake-up stroke (W-S) protocol were significantly associated with fewer stroke beds (P = .0092), fewer called stroke codes (P = .0040), physician-dependent transfer decisions (P = .0002), higher thrombolytic eligibility (P <.0001). Conversely, hospitals with more stroke admissions were less likely to have a W-S protocol (P = .0072), indicating that higher patient volume may influence protocol utilization. Conclusion: There is significant variability in which stroke centers follow a W-S protocol. While large Comprehensive Stroke Centers are more equipped with advanced imaging and specialized expertise necessary to evaluate patients with unknown time of onset, they demonstrated a lower frequency of endorsing a W-S protocol than smaller hospitals. Requiring CSCs to identify their W-S process of care may improve access and delivery of acute stroke therapy to patients who present with unknown onset times.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gebreyohanns et al. (2026) studied this question. Hospitals with a wake-up stroke protocol had higher thrombolytic eligibility rates and fewer stroke admissions compared to those without such protocols (P < .0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: