This research reveals connections between differential and linear cryptanalysis techniques, suggesting improved cryptographic resistance methods.
In recent years, progress in practical applications of multi-party computation (MPC), fully homomorphic encryption (FHE), and zero-knowledge proofs (ZKP) motivates people to explore symmetric-key cryptographic algorithms, as well as corresponding cryptanalysis techniques (such as differential cryptanalysis, linear cryptanalysis), over finite Abelian groups or prime fields Fₚ F p for large p . In this paper, we establish the links between linear cryptanalysis and differential cryptanalysis over general finite Abelian groups. As the first application, we revisit linear cryptanalysis and give general results of linear approximations over arbitrary finite Abelian groups. More precisely, we consider the linearity , which is the maximal non-trivial linear approximation, to characterize the resistance of a function against linear cryptanalysis. This thereby generalizes the work of Pott in 2004 and completes the generalization of Sidelnikov–Chabaud–Vaudenay’s bound from F₂ⁿ F 2 n to finite Abelian groups. As the second application, we give an exact expression for the correlation of differential-linear approximations over arbitrary finite Abelian groups ( Fₚⁿ F p n ) under the sole assumption that the two parts of the cipher are independent of each other. In particular, we completely generalize the differential-linear cryptanalysis from F₂ⁿ F 2 n to arbitrary finite Abelian groups ( Fₚⁿ F p n ).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: