PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Insects1 citationsOpen Access

Changes in Richness, Abundance, and Occurrence of Beetles in South Korea over Ten Years: Identifier Bias and Selection of Climate Change Indicators

View Full Paper
TKTae-Sung KwonSKSung-Soo KimGPGo-Eun Park

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate changes in beetle abundance and distribution in South Korea over a decade, assessing the impact of identifier bias.
  • Analyzed beetle data from pitfall traps collected between 2007-2009 and 2017-2019 at 273 forest sites.
  • Compared parameters including species richness, abundance, and occurrence between the two survey periods.
  • Assessed the impact of identifier bias on observed changes in abundance and distribution.
  • Identifier bias was found to affect recorded increases in beetle abundance and distribution.
  • Decreases in observed richness and abundance better reflected actual ecological changes.
  • Fewer taxa matched predictions when examining those with reduced abundance, suggesting improved accuracy in identification.

Abstract

Climate change is rapidly altering the distribution and abundance of species, with significant impacts on regional ecosystems, including reduced ecosystem services and the loss of biodiversity. Accurately predicting changes in the distribution and abundance of taxa under future climate scenarios is, therefore, crucial. In South Korea, beetle data collected via pitfall traps from approximately 300 forest sites between 2007 and 2009 (30 families, 4 genera, and 150 species) were used to forecast changes in their abundance and distribution under climate change scenarios RCP 4.5 and 8.5. This study evaluated the accuracy of those predictions using data from a subsequent survey conducted between 2017 and 2019. We compared species richness, abundance, changes in abundance (i.e., number of individuals), and occurrence (i.e., number of occupied sites) using data from 273 sites that were surveyed in both the initial (2007–2009) and follow-up (2017–2019) periods. All four parameters were found to be significantly influenced by the identifiers. This identifier bias was attributed to the omission of morphologically similar species in the initial survey or the loss of individuals during the preparation process of dry specimens. As a result, increases in abundance and distribution appear to have been affected by identification errors, whereas decreases more closely reflect actual ecological changes. When the comparison between predicted and observed results was restricted to taxa with reduced abundance and distribution, the number of taxa that matched the predictions was significantly higher than that of those that did not. Based on ease of identification, abundance, and sensitivity to climate change, we selected a set of indicator taxa (four families, two genera, and seven species) for climate change monitoring.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kwon et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fe27c1c9540dea80ff1ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/insects17020156
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful?2003 · 4,267 citations
  2. 2Early evolution of beetles regulated by the end-Permian deforestation2021 · 28 citations
  3. 3Prediction of abundance of beetles according to climate warming in South Korea2015 · 19 citations
  4. 4Evolution of feeding habits of sap beetles (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) and placement of Calonecrinae2020 · 36 citations
  5. 5Influence of land use change on rove beetle diversity: A systematic review and global meta-analysis of a mega-diverse insect group2020 · 52 citations