Key result
Only ~32% of the public recognizes diabetes as a major CVD risk factor.
Why the study?
Awareness of diabetes as a major risk factor for CVD may enhance uptake of diabetes screening and primary prevention of CVD.
Cross-Sectional (n=48,988)
Yes
Two-thirds of adults in surveyed middle- and high-income countries do not recognize diabetes as a major cardiovascular risk factor, highlighting a critical global gap in public health awareness.
Low awareness signals need for public education campaigns; leaves open whether this improves prevention behaviors.
OBJECTIVE: Awareness of diabetes as a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) may enhance uptake of screening for diabetes and primary prevention of CVD. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The American Heart Association conducted an online survey in 50 countries. The main outcome of this study was the proportion of individuals in each country who recognized diabetes as a CVD risk factor. We also examined variation by sex, age, geographic region, and country-level economic development. RESULTS: Among 48,988 respondents, 15,747 (32.1%) identified diabetes as a major CVD risk factor. Awareness was similar among men and women, but increased with age, and was greater in high-income than in middle-income countries. CONCLUSIONS: Two-thirds of adults in surveyed countries did not recognize diabetes as a major CVD risk factor. Given the increasing global burden of diabetes and CVD, this finding underscores the need for concerted efforts to raise public health awareness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chaudhary et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Awareness of diabetes as a cardiovascular disease risk factor (n=48,988). Demographic and geographic factors was evaluated on Proportion of individuals who correctly identified diabetes as a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In a survey of 48,988 adults across 50 countries, only 32.1% correctly identified diabetes as a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: