Key result
CVD risk factors are linked to ~20% lower odds of adequate diabetes and CVD risk knowledge.
Why the study?
Does having pre-existing CVD or risk factors for CVD improve knowledge of risk factors for diabetes/CVD among the Australian public?
Cross-Sectional (n=4,647)
Yes
Does having pre-existing CVD or risk factors for CVD improve knowledge of risk factors for diabetes/CVD among the Australian public?
Odds Ratio: 0.8 (95% CI 0.69–0.93)
p-value: p=0.003
Individuals with risk factors for CVD have poorer knowledge of these risk factors compared to those without risk factors, highlighting a need for targeted health education.
Targeted education may be warranted for those with CVD risk factors; hypothesis-generating for whether knowledge gaps influence risk factor development.
BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence on whether having pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) or risk factors for CVD such as diabetes, ensures greater knowledge of risk factors important for motivating preventative behaviours. Our objective was to compare knowledge among the Australian public participating in a health check program and their risk status. METHODS: Data from the Stroke Foundation 'Know your numbers' program were used. Staff in community pharmacies provided opportunistic health checks (measurement of blood pressure and diabetes risk assessment) among their customers. Participants were categorised: 1) CVD ± risk of CVD: history of stroke, heart disease or kidney disease, and may have risk factors; 2) risk of CVD only: reported having high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes or atrial fibrillation; and 3) CVD risk free (no CVD or risk of CVD). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed including adjustment for age and sex. FINDINGS: Among 4,647 participants, 12% had CVD (55% male, 85% aged 55+ years), 47% were at risk of CVD (40% male, 72% 55+ years) and 41% were CVD risk free (33% male, 27% 55+ years). Participants with CVD (OR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.55, 0.80) or risk factors for CVD (OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.57, 0.73) had poorer knowledge of the risk factors for diabetes/CVD compared to those who were CVD risk free. After adjustment, only participants with risk factors for CVD (OR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.69, 0.93) had poorer knowledge. Older participants (55+ years) and men had poorer knowledge of diabetes/CVD risk factors and complications of diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Participants with poorer knowledge of risk factors were older, more often male or were at risk of developing CVD compared with those who were CVD risk free. Health education in these high risk groups should be a priority, as diabetes and CVD are increasing in prevalence throughout the world.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kilkenny et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease and diabetes risk (n=4,647). Risk factors for cardiovascular disease vs. CVD risk free was evaluated on Greater knowledge of risk factors for diabetes/CVD (knowledge score ≥6) (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.93, p=0.003). Participants with risk factors for cardiovascular disease had significantly poorer knowledge of diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk factors compared to those who were risk-free (adjusted OR 0.80).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: