Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Simulation evaluates a non-toxic bi-propellant's performance, suggesting it as a safer thruster alternative.
To replace highly toxic hydrazin-driven reaction control systems, a number of non-toxic alternatives are under development. These are usually referred to as “green propellants”. One candidate is the bi-propellant combination of nitrous oxide and hydrocarbons that combine good storability with a comparatively high specific impulse (ISP) at a medium to low system complexity level compared to existing hydrazine thrusters. This propellant combination was chosen because of experimentally available results with C2H4-N2O thrusters as validation data. One advantage of this fuel/oxidizer combination is that both gases are self-pressurant and that they can be used as monopropellants at a lower specific impulse ISP with reduced model complexity. This helps the design of the propulsion system on satellites. A detailed numerical simulation of a representative thruster based on the fuel combination ethylene and nitrous oxide is presented. The numerical model is set up with a suitable kinetic reaction mechanism for the simulation of the reactive mixture in the combustion chamber. It is validated against experimental data available in the literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fechter et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: