Comparative analysis evaluates wear resistance in hardfacing alloys, indicating effective testing methods.
Wear resistance of hardfaced or cladded protective layers is commonly assessed through hardness measurements. Traditionally, this involves single-point diamond indenter tests. However, in complex cladding alloys, such methods often yield inconsistent results due to significant differences between the hardness of the metallic matrix and harder constituents, such as carbides or nitrides. To address this, the authors performed a series of scratch tests on four wear-resistant hardfacing materials. The method involves producing a scratch under constant load on a polished bead surface and measuring the resulting groove width as an indirect measure of hardness and wear behavior. The study focuses on four FCAW hardfacing wires: a Cr-Si-C-Mn solid cored wire (Alloy A), a Cr-Mo-C-Si-Mn cored wire (Alloy B), a nickel-sheathed macrocrystalline tungsten carbide cored wire (Alloy C), and an original Fe(Mn)-Mo-B-C hardfacing alloy (Alloy D) developed by one of the authors. All materials were deposited on C45 steel substrates. Comparative analysis included scratch tests, abrasion wear tests, and thermodynamic modeling. The scratch test approach proved effective in evaluating and optimizing deposition parameters to achieve improved wear resistance of the investigated Fe–Cr–C, Ni–WC, and Fe–Mo–Mn–B hardfacing systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pawlik et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: