This review examines biomechanical factors influencing injury and repair in lumbar disc herniation, suggesting new therapeutic approaches.
Objective: Lumbar disc herniation is among the most common and disabling spinal disorders, driven by the interplay of mechanical overload, structural failure, and cellular dysfunction. Despite advances in surgical interventions, achieving true biological repair of herniated discs remains a major clinical challenge. This review aims to critically examine the biomechanical landscape of disc herniation, focusing on how altered load transmission, tissue stiffness, and structural disruption influence cellular behavior and tissue regeneration. It further explores mechanobiological mechanisms governing repair and highlights emerging biomimetic models and technologies that integrate mechanical and biological insights to promote functional disc restoration.Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the Web of Science Core Collection, PubMed (National Library of Medicine), and ScienceDirect databases. The search was limited to peer-reviewed journal articles published in English and focused on studies related to lumbar disc herniation.Results: While decades of research have elucidated the biomechanical factors contributing to disc herniation, recent advances in mechanobiology have uncovered how mechanical cues influence cellular behavior, tissue repair, and degeneration. Evidence suggests that true disc regeneration cannot be achieved through biological replacement or mechanical stabilization alone; rather, it requires restoring functional biomechanics, specifically, the disc’s ability to sense, adapt to, and sustain physiological loading.Conclusion: Viewing disc herniation through a mechanobiological lens offers new opportunities to develop targeted therapies aimed at restoring both tissue integrity and load-bearing functionality, paving the way for more effective regenerative interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vadala et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: