Experimental study demonstrates improved feed identification in aquaculture, suggesting advancements for real-time monitoring.
Identifying floating residual feed is a critical technology in recirculating aquaculture systems, aiding water-quality control and the development of intelligent feeding models. However, existing research is largely based on ideal indoor environments and lacks adaptability to complex outdoor scenarios. Moreover, current methods for this task often suffer from high computational costs, poor real-time performance, and limited recognition accuracy. To address these issues, this study first validates in outdoor aquaculture tanks that instance segmentation is more suitable than individual detection for handling clustered and adhesive feed residues. We therefore propose LMFF–YOLO, a lightweight multi-scale fusion feed segmentation model based on YOLOv8n-seg. This model achieves the first collaborative optimization of lightweight architecture and segmentation accuracy specifically tailored for outdoor residual feed segmentation tasks. To enhance recognition capability, we construct a network using a Context-Fusion Diffusion Pyramid Network (CFDPN) and a novel Multi-scale Feature Fusion Module (MFFM) to improve multi-scale and contextual feature capture, supplemented by an efficient local attention mechanism at the backbone’s end for refined local feature extraction. To reduce computational costs and improve real-time performance, the original C2f module is replaced with a C2f-Reparameterization vision block, and a shared-convolution local-focus lightweight segmentation head is designed. Experimental results show that LMFF–YOLO achieves an mAP50 of 87.1% (2.6% higher than YOLOv8n-seg), enabling more precise estimation of residual feed quantity. Coupled with a 19.1% and 20.0% reduction in parameters and FLOPs, this model provides a practical solution for real-time monitoring, supporting feed waste reduction and intelligent feeding strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: