Prognostic biomarkers identify clinical outcomes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, suggesting implications for risk stratification.
Background/Objectives: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive and heterogeneous malignancy, for which predicting clinical outcomes remains challenging. Although immune-checkpoint pathways are known to influence tumor biology, the impact of their germline variants on DLBCL susceptibility and prognosis has not been fully elucidated. Methods: Variants in PD-L1 gene CD274 (rs4143815, rs822336), and miR-155 gene MIR155HG (rs767649, rs1893650), assessed by TaqMan assays in 99 DLBCL patients and 113 age- and sex-matched healthy controls, were associated with clinicopathological features, treatment response, overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and disease susceptibility. Results: The PD-L1 variant rs822336 was significantly associated with relapse status (p = 0.005) and RFS (p = 0.008), with the wild-type GG genotype showing the poorest RFS that remained independent in the multivariate Cox analysis (HR = 2.387, p = 0.003). Conversely, rs4143815 showed a nominal association with treatment resistance (p = 0.026), while patients carrying the GG genotype had worse OS (p = 0.006). In susceptibility analyses, miR-155 variant rs767649 showed a nominal association with DLBCL risk, with the rare AA genotype showing an increased risk of DLBCL (OR = 5.234, p = 0.045), which did not remain significant after Bonferroni correction. Conclusions: In a hypothesis-generating manner, these findings suggest that PD-L1 genetic variants may predominantly influence disease progression and outcomes, while miR-155 variation may contribute to DLBCL susceptibility. These findings highlight germline immunogenetic variants as stable, treatment-independent markers that may inform future studies on risk stratification and prognosis in DLBCL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: