Key result
Time-aligned segmental strain analysis shows ~0.93 AUC for detecting obstructive CAD in CABG patients.
Why the study?
Myocardial strain curves provide insights into CAD beyond conventional peak strain measurements, but the diagnostic utility of time-aligned segmental strain and strain rate curves to identify obstructive CAD required evaluation.
Does time-aligned segmental strain analysis improve the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with chronic chest pain?
Observational (n=598)
Does time-aligned segmental strain analysis improve the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with chronic chest pain?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.933
p-value: p=<0.05
Time-aligned segmental strain analysis, particularly early diastolic strain rate, provides excellent diagnostic accuracy for identifying advanced coronary artery disease but is limited for detecting mild or single-vessel disease.
Background Myocardial strain curves provide valuable insights into coronary artery disease (CAD) beyond conventional peak strain measurements. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of time-aligned segmental strain and strain rate (S/SR) curves to identify obstructive CAD in chest pain patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Methods A total of 510 chest pain patients referred for CCTA and 88 post-revascularized MI patients were included. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed, and segmental strain curves were time-aligned using aortic valve closure (AVC) and cardiac cycle length as reference points. Average S/SR curves were generated for 18 myocardial segments, establishing reference curves from a group of 314 chronic chest-pain patients without CAD. Deviations were defined based on thresholds of peak S/SR or average S/SR curve deviation over systole and the first half of diastole. Results Significant differences were observed between groups, particularly between the revascularized MI, CABG, or 3-vessel CAD groups compared to the No-CAD group (p<0.05). ROC curve analysis demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance for CABG patients (AUC = 0.933), while the detection rate for PCI was limited (AUC < 0.7). Global longitudinal strain rate in early diastole (GLSR E) and segmental peak SR E showed the highest diagnostic accuracy. These findings confirm that time-aligned strain analysis improves the detection of significant CAD but remains limited for identifying patients with mild disease. Conclusion Time-aligned segmental strain analysis improved detection of regional dysfunction but could not distinguish single-vessel from non-obstructive CAD, while strain rate in early diastole demonstrated excellent accuracy for identifying high-grade disease requiring CABG. Pathological strain patterns became significant only in advanced CAD, indicating that resting strain analysis has clinical utility primarily for identifying advanced coronary disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roesner et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Obstructive coronary artery disease (n=598). Time-aligned segmental strain and strain rate (S/SR) curves vs. Patients without CAD was evaluated on Identification of high-grade CAD requiring CABG (AUC 0.933, p=<0.05). Time-aligned segmental strain analysis demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance for identifying high-grade coronary artery disease requiring CABG (AUC = 0.933).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: