Key result
AI model for RV systolic function strongly predicts all-cause mortality with AUC ~0.92 in PH.
Why the study?
Right ventricular systolic function is an independent predictor of outcome, but a robust automated method of quantitation is lacking.
Does an automated AI-based assessment of RV systolic function accurately quantify RV dysfunction and predict clinical outcomes in patients undergoing echocardiography?
Observational (n=16,261)
Yes
Does an automated AI-based assessment of RV systolic function accurately quantify RV dysfunction and predict clinical outcomes in patients undergoing echocardiography?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.907 (95% CI 0.888-0.926)
A fully automated deep learning model using 2D apical 4-chamber echo views accurately quantifies RV systolic function and predicts mortality and heart failure hospitalization across diverse patient populations.
May support automated RV assessment in echo workflows; extends manual prognostic data to AI quantification in observational cohorts.
Background Right ventricular (RV) systolic function is an independent predictor of outcome, but a robust automated method of quantitation is lacking. Purpose To develop and validate a deep learning model for quantifying RV systolic function from 2D echo clips and assess its prognostic value in various loading states and left-heart disease. Methods A deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) was developed to quantitate RV systolic function using all available apical 4 chamber (A4C) views from 13,039 patients (61,187 A4C video clips) in a US institution. Videos were converted to frames of 256x256 grayscale pixels, with graphics, including the ECG, removed. The model used the S3D architecture, a 3D-CNN with many of the spatial and temporal convolutions separated. RV free wall longitudinal strain (RVFWLS) was used to define RV function: normal (≤-25%); mild (-20% to –24%); moderate (-15% to –19%) and severe RV dysfunction (0% to –14%). The AI-estimate was the average of multiple 32-frame segments for each clip identified as an A4C, including both standard and RV-focused variations. The model was validated in four distinct clinical cohorts from independent data sources: 1) 1365 patients referred to an external diagnostic echocardiography lab in a different US state; 2) 569 patients recruited prospectively with known or suspected pulmonary hypertension (PH); 3) 416 patients with moderate or greater tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR); 4) 872 patients imaged at an Eastern European University with left-sided cardiac diseases (valvular disease, cardiomyopathies, etc.), athletes, or healthy volunteers. Results Model output was strongly correlated with the presence of RV dysfunction by manual measurement [AUC 0.907 (95% CI: 0.888-0.926)] in the internal validation set. Results were similar in an external validation US cohort [N=1365; AUC 0.919 (95% CI: 0.899-0.939)]. When the model was applied to 569 patients with known or suspected PH, presence and severity of the AI measures of RV dysfunction were strongly associated with functional class, 6 min walk distance, NT-proBNP levels and right heart failure (p<0.001). The presence and severity of RV dysfunction (as categorized by the AI model) was strongly associated with all-cause mortality in patients with PH (Figure 1A) and in patients with significant TR (Figure 1B). The European cohort was a geographically and institutionally distinct cohort with a low prevalence of >mild TR (10.8%) or PH (6.4%). In this cohort the AI model predicted a reduced RVEF (< 45%) with an AUC of 0.864 (95% CI: 0.831-0.898) and associated with both all-cause mortality (Figure 2A) and a composite endpoint of heart failure hospitalization or death (Figure 2B). Conclusions A fully automated, AI-based assessment of RV systolic function, using 2D apical 4 chamber echo views alone, is highly feasible and can accurately categorize disease severity and predict outcome across a wide spectrum of cardiovascular conditions.Figure 1 Figure 2
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jackson et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Right ventricular dysfunction (n=16,261). Automated AI analysis of right ventricular systolic function vs. Manual measurement was evaluated on Presence of RV dysfunction by manual measurement (AUC 0.907, 95% CI 0.888-0.926). An automated AI model accurately quantified right ventricular systolic function from 2D echo clips, strongly correlating with manual measurement (AUC 0.907; 95% CI 0.888-0.926).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: