This essay argues that denying ontology affects scientific inquiry and understanding, challenging contemporary views on metaphysics.
A widely respected posture in contemporary scientific and technological culture claims that metaphysics is optional—that serious inquiry concerns models, predictions, and engineering results, not ontological speculation. This essay argues that such neutrality is impossible. Every research program presupposes some account of what exists, what counts as evidence, and what kinds of explanation are admissible. Part of the Return to Consciousness research program—18 philosophical essays exploring consciousness-first metaphysics. Full project: https://brunoton.github.io/return-to-consciousness/
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bruno Tonetto (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: