PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Notion of Value in the Global Academic Discourse: Identification and Representation in the Main Approaches to Cultural Heritage Preservation

View Full Paper
JŠJelena ŠćekićMNMarko NikolićAMAleksandra Milovanović

Key Points

  • The research aims to explore how different approaches to cultural heritage preservation define and apply the notion of value.
  • Identified and selected academic articles from the Scopus database
  • Eliminated duplicates to create a final dataset
  • Conducted bibliometric analysis to assess publishing trends
  • Performed content analysis to classify and compare value types
  • Significant variations found in how values are represented across different approaches
  • Cultural, historical, aesthetic, social, and economic values are most frequently recognized
  • Only a small number of studies operationalise values with clear criteria or indicators
  • Lack of consensus on value interpretation highlighted across the field

Abstract

This study examines how the notion of value is defined, recognised, and operationalised within the four main approaches to cultural heritage preservation: the material-based, value-based, living heritage, and historic urban landscape approaches. Positioned within the broader discourse on the evolving understanding of cultural heritage—from fixed, expert-driven interpretations toward more contextual, socially constructed, and participatory perspectives—this research aims to address which value types are recognised, and how and to what extent they are operationalised by applying four main approaches to cultural heritage preservation. The methodology comprises four phases: (1) the identification, search, and selection of academic articles in the Scopus database, (2) sample overlapping and elimination of duplicates to establish a final dataset, (3) bibliometric analysis to determine publishing trends and disciplinary reach, and (4) content analysis to identify, classify, and compare value types across the selected approaches. The results reveal significant variation in how values are represented, as well as notable inconsistency in their direct inclusion in research processes. While cultural, historical, aesthetic, social, and economic values dominate across approaches, only a fraction of studies operationalise values through defined criteria or indicators. The findings highlight the absence of consensus in value interpretation and emphasise the need for more systematic, integrative, and operationalisable frameworks for treating values in the process of cultural heritage preservation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Šćekić et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980ffc6c1c9540dea812940https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture6010020
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Reconceptualising technological value in architectural heritage2026
  2. 2Metamorphic heritage values: Revisiting architectural heritage assessment in clustered and residual contexts2026
  3. 3A holistic approach to valuing culture in seven domains2025
  4. 4The scope and content of the concepts of "cultural value" and "cultural heritage" in the system of legal categories2026
  5. 5Value Foundations of Cultural Industry Typologies: International and Russian Practice2025