Investigates the influence of financial market infrastructure on stability in emerging economies, suggesting the need for improved governance and technology integration.
This study interrogates the widely held assumption that Financial Market Infrastructure (FMI) development inherently stabilizes financial systems. Using data from India, China, Singapore, and Bangladesh (2011–2021), it empirically tests how FMI development influences financial stability and spillover risk, and whether this relationship is conditioned by technological advancement and regulatory quality. Using a robust estimation strategy that includes WLS regression, bootstrapped mediation, and moderation analysis, the study uncovers a striking asymmetry. While FMI development significantly reduces capital flow volatility, its direct effect on financial stability is statistically weak and even slightly negative. This counterintuitive result challenges conventional policy orthodoxy and reveals that FMIs alone are insufficient to anchor domestic stability. Instead, their effectiveness is realized when embedded within strong regulatory regimes and digitally mature ecosystems. This novel insight contributes to financial systems research and calls for second-generation FMI policy thinking that prioritizes governance, interoperability, and institutional readiness over infrastructure scale alone. For emerging economies, the findings underscore the urgency of aligning FMI strategies with regulatory reform and fintech capability to mitigate systemic vulnerabilities and maximize resilience. FMIs must be viewed not merely as operational tools, but as strategic nodes within the architecture of modern financial governance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parashar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: