Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 1, 2006Psychological Methods

Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index?

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

THTania B. Huedo–MedinaIkerbasqueJSJulio Sánchez‐MecaUniversidad de MurciaFMFulgencio Marín‐MartínezNation University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Huedo–Medina et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69818f0b36c2d4a1571af699https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.11.2.193
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis2002 · 37,602 citations
  2. 2Weighting by Inverse Variance or by Sample Size in Meta-Analysis: A Simulation Study1998 · 83 citations
  3. 3Power and Accuracy of the Schmidt and Hunter Meta-Analytic Procedures1993 · 39 citations
  4. 4The Problems in Using Fixed-Effects Models of Meta-Analysis on Real-World Data2003 · 240 citations