PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Materials3 citationsOpen Access

Process–Microstructure–Property Characteristics of Aluminum Walls Fabricated by Hybrid Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing with Friction Stir Processing

View Full Paper
AEAhmed Nabil ElalemXWXin Wu

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the impact of integrating friction stir processing into wire arc additive manufacturing on aluminum wall properties.
  • Fabrication of walls using hybrid unified additive deformation manufacturing process and MIG-based WAAM.
  • Use of infrared thermography to assess heat distribution.
  • Optical microscopy and image analysis to measure microstructural characteristics.
  • Microhardness testing using Vickers hardness measurement.
  • UAMFSP maintained heat below approximately 400 °C, unlike MIG which reached up to 1000 °C.
  • Grain size in UAMFSP walls was significantly refined, with a mean grain area of about 10.9 µm² compared to 314 µm² for MIG.
  • Microhardness of UAMFSP walls improved by 45.8%, with values of 75.8 HV compared to 52.0 HV for MIG.

Abstract

Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) is a cost-effective method for fabricating large aluminum components; however, it tends to suffer from heat accumulation and coarse anisotropic microstructures, which can limit the part’s performance. In this study, a wall is fabricated using a hybrid unified additive deformation manufacturing process (UAMFSP) method, which integrates friction stir processing (FSP) into WAAM, and is compared with a Metal Inert Gas (MIG)-based WAAM wall. Infrared (IR) thermography revealed progressive heat buildup in MIG walls, with peak layer temperatures of about 870 to 1000 °C. In contrast, in the UAMFSP process, heat was redistributed through mechanical stirring, maintaining more uniform sub-solidus profiles below approximately 400 °C. Also, optical microscopy and quantitative image analysis showed that MIG walls developed coarse, dendritic grains with a mean grain area of about 314 µm2, whereas the UAMFSP produced refined, equiaxed grains with a mean grain area of about 10.9 µm2. Microhardness measurement (Vickers HV0.2, 200 gf) confirmed that the UAMFSP process can improve the hardness by 45.8% compared to the MIG process (75.8 ± 7.7 HV vs. 52.0 ± 1.3 HV; p = 0.0027). In summary, the outcomes of this study introduce the UAMFSP process as a method for addressing the thermal and microstructural limitations of WAAM. These findings provide a framework for further extending hybrid additive–deformation strategies to thicker builds, alternative alloys, and service-relevant mechanical evaluations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Elalem et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69843433f1d9ada3c1fb20a7https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19030580
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1In-situ induce reinforcement in WAAM of Al-matrix composite using active N2 as shielding gas followed by friction stir processing2024 · 12 citations
  2. 2Review on Fatigue of Additive Manufactured Metallic Alloys: Microstructure, Performance, Enhancement, and Assessment Methods2023 · 122 citations
  3. 3Oxide accumulation effects on wire + arc layer-by-layer additive manufacture process2017 · 124 citations
  4. 4Revisiting fundamental welding concepts to improve additive manufacturing: From theory to practice2019 · 618 citations
  5. 5Unit block–based process planning strategy of WAAM for complex shell–shaped component2019 · 42 citations