Experimental study investigates microstructure and mechanical properties in aluminium alloy joints, suggesting improved welding processes.
As a solid-state joining technology, friction stir welding (FSW) exhibits significant advantages for joining aluminium alloys, including low heat input and minimal formation of intermetallic compounds, thereby enhancing joint quality and mitigating deformation. This study investigates the single-sided and double-sided FSW processes of 3 mm thick 7075-T6 aluminium alloy sheets, focusing on characterising the microstructure and mechanical properties of the joints. Experimental results show that at a rotational speed of 1500 rpm and a welding speed of 80 mm/min, the double-sided co-directional FSW joint achieves a tensile strength of 388 MPa and an elongation of 7.09%, significantly outperforming those of the other two welding paths. In the weld nugget zone (WNZ), continuous dynamic recrystallization (CDRX) occurs, generating uniformly refined equiaxed grains (average size: 1.10 μm) and facilitating the transformation of low-angle grain boundaries (LAGBs) to high-angle grain boundaries (HAGBs). Meanwhile, the strong rotated cube texture is remarkably weakened and replaced by random recrystallized brass textures with the lowest kernel average misorientation (KAM) value in the WNZ. In contrast, the thermo-mechanically affected zone (TMAZ) accumulates a high density of LAGBs due to welding-induced plastic deformation. Microhardness testing reveals a typical “W”-shaped distribution: WNZ hardness is relatively high but slightly lower than that of the base metal (BM), and the minimum hardness of the advancing side (AS) of the heat-affected zone (HAZ) is higher than that of the retreating side (RS). This study confirms that double-sided co-directional FSW crucially regulates microstructural evolution and improves the mechanical properties of 7075-T6 aluminium alloy joints, providing a viable process optimisation strategy for high-quality welding of thin-gauge sheets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: