PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions4 citations

Influence of Pullback Pressure Gradient on Residual Angina at One Year

TMTakuya MizukamiKIKazumasa IkedaDMDaniel Munhoz

Key Result

In patients with coronary artery disease, focal disease (high PPG) improved angina score at 1 year compared to diffuse disease (95.3 vs 92.5; P=0.006).

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the relationship between pullback pressure gradient and residual angina at one year after treatment for coronary artery disease.
  • Conducted a prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial.
  • Enrolled patients with at least one lesion and fractional flow reserve ≤0.80.
  • Calculated pullback pressure gradient and adjusted treatment plans accordingly.
  • Assessed patient-reported outcomes using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire before and after one year.
  • Included 947 patients with measured PPG and Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores at 1 year.
  • Patients with focal disease had significantly less angina compared to those with diffuse disease (95.3 vs 92.5; P=0.006).
  • Higher PPG values were independently linked to better angina outcomes (P=0.017).

Structured PICO

Does focal coronary artery disease defined by high pullback pressure gradient (PPG) improve residual angina at 1 year compared to diffuse disease in patients with flow-limiting CAD?

P
Population
947 patients with at least 1 coronary lesion with a fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≤0.80 intended to be treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Mean age 67.6 years, 24% female, 29% with diabetes.
I
Intervention
Focal coronary artery disease (defined by a high pullback pressure gradient [PPG] > 0.62)
C
Comparator
Diffuse coronary artery disease (defined by a low pullback pressure gradient [PPG] ≤ 0.62)
O
Outcome
Residual angina assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) angina frequency score at 1-year follow-uppatient reported

In patients with flow-limiting coronary artery disease, focal disease defined by a high pullback pressure gradient is associated with significantly greater symptomatic relief of angina at 1 year compared to diffuse disease.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The pullback pressure gradient (PPG) is a novel physiological metric that quantifies coronary artery disease patterns as focal or diffuse on a scale from 0 to 1. This study assessed the relationship between PPG and residual angina at 1 year. METHODS: PPG Global is a prospective, investigator-initiated, single-arm, multicenter study that enrolled patients with at least 1 lesion with a fractional flow reserve ≤0.80 intended to be treated with PCI. After the PPG calculation, physicians could revise treatment assignment to medical therapy or coronary artery bypass graft surgery instead of PCI. Focal and diffuse disease were defined based on the median PPG value of 0.62. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire at baseline and 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: The study included 947 patients with PPG and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire at 1 year. The mean age was 67.6±10.2 years, 24% were female, and 29% had diabetes. At 1 year, patients with focal coronary artery disease reported less angina than those with diffuse coronary artery disease (Seattle Angina Questionnaire angina frequency score, 95.3±9.9 versus 92.5±15.0; P =0.006). PPG was independently associated with improvement in angina ( P =0.017). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with flow-limiting coronary artery disease, the presence of focal disease defined by high PPG was associated with greater symptomatic relief at 1 year compared with diffuse disease (low PPG). By reflecting the physiological pattern of disease and its relation to symptom relief after treatment, PPG may help inform revascularization strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mizukami et al. (2026) studied this question. In patients with coronary artery disease, focal disease (high PPG) improved angina score at 1 year compared to diffuse disease (95.3 vs 92.5; P=0.006).

synapsesocial.com/papers/698434c0f1d9ada3c1fb354ehttps://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.125.015851
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper