Why the study?
While pullback pressure gradient (PPG) enables prediction of post-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR), the prognostic performance of a PPG model and whether predicted post-PCI physiological outcomes are associated with adverse events following PCI remained to be determined.
Does a pullback pressure gradient (PPG) model predicting suboptimal post-PCI physiology identify patients at higher risk for target vessel failure at 1 year in patients with hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease undergoing PCI?
Observational (n=855)
Yes
Does a pullback pressure gradient (PPG) model predicting suboptimal post-PCI physiology identify patients at higher risk for target vessel failure at 1 year in patients with hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease undergoing PCI?
A pullback pressure gradient-based prediction model accurately estimates post-PCI FFR and identifies vessels with predicted suboptimal physiology that are at nearly double the risk of target vessel failure at 1 year.
Background Impaired flow following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a known predictor of adverse outcomes. The pullback pressure gradient (PPG) is a novel physiological metric that differentiates focal from diffuse disease and enables prediction of post-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR). This post hoc analysis of the PPG Global (NCT04789317) study aimed to evaluate the prognostic performance of a PPG model for predicting post-PCI FFR and to determine whether the predicted physiological outcome is associated with adverse events following PCI. Methods Prospective and multicenter study including patients with hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease undergoing PCI. A prediction model based on FFR and PPG was used to estimate post-PCI FFR. Based on the predicted values, vessels were classified as having either optimal or suboptimal post-PCI physiology. The primary end point was target vessel failure at 1 year. Target vessel failure was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization. Results A total of 855 patients (890 vessels) were analyzed. The mean difference between predicted and measured post-PCI FFR was 0.001 (limits of agreement, –0.10 to 0.10). There was a strong correlation between predicted and measured delta FFR (r=0.92 [95% CI, 0.91–0.93]; P<0.001). Vessels with predicted suboptimal post-PCI physiology had a significantly higher incidence of target vessel failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.24–3.15]; P=0.004). Predicted suboptimal physiology was independently associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Conclusions PPG-predicted post-PCI physiology was associated with target vessel failure at 1 year. These findings extend the role of coronary physiology beyond diagnostic assessment to include risk stratification and outcome prediction following PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Munhoz et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease undergoing PCI (n=855). PPG-predicted suboptimal post-PCI physiology vs. PPG-predicted optimal post-PCI physiology was evaluated on Target vessel failure at 1 year (composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization) (adjusted HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.24-3.15, p=0.004).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: