Key result
Lower diastolic wall strain correlates with increased LVMI and impaired myocardial relaxation in HFpEF.
Why the study?
Impaired diastolic wall thinning reflects resistance to deformation and increased myocardial stiffness, prompting investigation into the role of diastolic wall strain in HFpEF and its correlation with HFpEF indices.
Does diastolic wall strain correlate with established echocardiographic and biomarker indices of diastolic dysfunction in patients with HFpEF?
Cross-Sectional (n=53)
Does diastolic wall strain correlate with established echocardiographic and biomarker indices of diastolic dysfunction in patients with HFpEF?
Diastolic wall strain correlates with established markers of diastolic dysfunction and myocardial stiffness in HFpEF, suggesting its potential utility as an echocardiographic research tool.
Background Diastolic wall strain (DWS) is based on linear elastic theory, which shows that impaired diastolic wall thinning reflects resistance to deformation in diastole and thus, increased diastolic myocardial stiffness. We aim to explore the role of DWS in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in terms of correlation with indices of HFpEF. Methods Study enrolled 53 patients with exertional dyspnoea and normal left ventricular ejection fraction. Forty patients fulfilled the criteria for HFpEF according to ESC 2023 criteria. Results Two groups were analysed – Group 1 with criteria of HFpEF fulfilled and Group 2 with those who did not. Echocardiographic indices including relative wall thickness (RWT), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), E/e’, left atrial volume index (LAVI) and DWS were numerically different on comparison with group 2, with LVMI, LAVI and E/e’ statistically significant. Also mean Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) was found to be −13.05%. Group 1 was divided into HFpEF with DWS ≤ median and HFpEF with DWS > median. Echocardiographic indices showed statistically higher LVMI and atrial filling fraction. This finding showed that patients with reduced DWS were more likely to have diastolic dysfunction. Also, it was found that DWS had a statistically significant correlation with LVMI, LAVI and RWT. Lower DWS had abnormal GLS. Limitations include small sample size. Conclusion Although difference in DWS between HFpEF and controls did not reach statistical significance, stratification by median value showed significant correlation of DWS with myocardial relaxation parameters. Also, with significant correlation with increased atrial filling fraction higher N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide and correlation with impaired GLS, our study supports DWS as a potential research tool in evaluation of HFpEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krishnamurthy et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=53). Diastolic wall strain (DWS) vs. Patients without HFpEF or higher DWS was evaluated on Correlation of DWS with indices of HFpEF. Lower diastolic wall strain in HFpEF patients was significantly correlated with higher left ventricular mass index, left atrial volume index, and abnormal global longitudinal strain.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: