Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In vitro study evaluates mechanical properties of patient-specific 3D-printed aligners, suggesting directions for future improvements.
Clear aligners are a popular alternative to fixed orthodontic appliances; however, technical data on the optimal final aligner shell thickness for directly printed aligners remain limited. This in vitro experimental pilot study evaluated the mechanical response of patient-specific, directly 3D-printed aligners of four nominal shell thicknesses (0.04, 0.06, 0.08, and 0.10 mm) fabricated from BioMed Clear resin. A single subject with dental crowding was scanned and a set of aligner shells was designed and printed (n = 3 per thickness). Compressive tests up to 1000 N were performed and compressive extension (mm) recorded; group means ± SD were compared by means of one-way ANOVA. No statistically significant differences in compressive extension were found among the four thickness groups (ANOVA, F(3,8) = 2.242, p = 0.161). The 0.08 mm group showed a lower mean compressive extension in this dataset, but the difference did not reach statistical significance; given the small sample size and single-subject nature of the study, this result should be considered exploratory. This recent study clarifies printing and post-processing parameters and highlights limitations and directions for future work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reynosa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: