In vitro study examines layer thickness effects on mechanical properties of aligner resin, suggesting optimal settings for strength and flexibility.
Objectives: The Objective of the study is to examine how print layer settings—50 and 100 µm affect the mechanical behavior of a clinically used direct-printed aligner resin. Material and Methods: This in vitro study investigated how printing layer thickness influences the mechanical properties of a directly printed aligner resin (Graphy Tera Harz TA-28). A total of 60 specimens were fabricated using a Uniz Nbee printer and divided into two groups based on layer thickness (50 µm and 100 µm; n = 30 per group). Standardized specimens for tensile, flexural, and compressive testing (n = 10 per test per group) were designed from STL templates and printed under identical conditions to ensure consistency. All samples underwent uniform post-processing, including centrifugation, ultrasonic cleaning, and nitrogen-assisted UV curing. Mechanical testing was carried out using a universal testing machine in accordance with ISO standards: ISO 527-2 for tensile testing, ISO 178 for flexural testing, and ISO 604 for compressive testing. The primary outcomes were strength and modulus values for each test. Data were analyzed using independent t-tests or Mann–Whitney U tests depending on data normality, with statistical significance set at α = 0.05. Results: Compressive strength was significantly higher for the 50 µm group (2.42 ± 0.61 MPa) compared with the 100 µm group (1.84 ± 0.37 MPa; p = 0.034). Conversely, the 100 µm specimens demonstrated a higher tensile modulus (114.12 ± 44.01 MPa) than the 50 µm specimens (72.14 ± 25.8 MPa; p = 0.01). Conclusion: Layer thickness influences the mechanical behavior of the Graphy TA-28 resin. Thinner layers improved compressive performance, while thicker layers increased tensile stiffness. These findings suggest that print settings can be tailored to achieve desired aligner strength and flexibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: