Key result
PCI of critical LAD stenosis restores sustained sinus rhythm in a patient with 3-year persistent AF.
Why the study?
Although ischemia can promote atrial arrhythmogenesis, sustained restoration of sinus rhythm after revascularization alone is unusual.
Does coronary revascularization (PCI) restore sinus rhythm in a patient with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation and coexisting coronary artery disease?
Case Report (n=1)
Does coronary revascularization (PCI) restore sinus rhythm in a patient with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation and coexisting coronary artery disease?
Ischemia may be a reversible driver of atrial fibrillation, and coronary revascularization alone can lead to immediate and sustained restoration of sinus rhythm in selected patients.
May suggest ischemia as reversible driver of persistent AF; leaves open whether PCI restores sinus rhythm beyond this case.
Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) commonly coexists with coronary artery disease (CAD) due to overlapping risk factors. Although ischemia can promote atrial arrhythmogenesis, sustained restoration of sinus rhythm after revascularization alone is unusual. Case summary A 55-year-old man with hypertension and long-standing persistent AF (three years) was referred for pulmonary vein isolation. Echocardiography showed mild LV dysfunction (LVEF 48%) and basal septal thinning. Rest 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) demonstrated moderate apical and mild to moderate inferior wall defects; 18F-FDG PET/CT with myocardial-suppression showed no focal myocardial FDG uptake to suggest active inflammation. Coronary angiography demonstrated critical proximal LAD stenosis (95%) and minor RCA disease (30%). Following LAD PCI (3 × 15 mm DES), the patient spontaneously converted to sinus rhythm within two hours and has remained in sinus rhythm for six months without antiarrhythmic drugs. LV function normalized at one month. Discussion AF usually arises from pulmonary-vein triggers acting on a remodelled atrial substrate; chronic comorbidities (hypertension, obesity, diabetes, sleep apnoea), accelerated fibrosis, conduction slowing, and re-entry. CAD is prevalent in AF cohorts (17–46.5%), reflecting shared risk profiles and potential ischemic effects on the atria. Experimental work shows atrial ischemia shortens refractoriness, increases dispersion of repolarization, and heightens AF inducibility. Coronary occlusion (particularly RCA) facilitates both triggers and substrate. Clinically, reports conflict on whether coronary artery disease worsens post-ablation outcomes: large registries found no independent association between CAD burden and AF recurrence, while other studies observed higher recurrence in CAD with benefit from revascularization prior to ablation. Our case adds a rare but persuasive datapoint: ischemia-driven AF that terminated immediately after PCI without ablation or antiarrhythmics, followed by durable sinus rhythm and rapid left ventricular recovery—features that argue causality. Conclusion In atrial fibrillation patients with coexisting CAD, ischemia may be a reversible driver of arrhythmia. This case demonstrates immediate and sustained restoration of sinus rhythm after PCI without antiarrhythmics or ablation. Incorporating ischemia evaluation into pre-ablation assessment may avert invasive procedures and optimize outcomes in selected individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sukumaran et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease (n=1). Coronary revascularization (LAD PCI) was evaluated on Restoration of sinus rhythm. Coronary revascularization (PCI) in a 55-year-old man with 3-year persistent atrial fibrillation led to immediate and sustained restoration of sinus rhythm for 6 months without antiarrhythmics.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: