Key result
Left circumflex artery obstruction detected by CCT was independently associated with a higher risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence after persistent AF ablation (HR 2.32; 95% CI 1.36-3.98; P<0.01).
Why the study?
While myocardial infarction is associated with atrial fibrillation, the role of stable coronary artery disease in persistent AF recurrence after ablation remains unknown.
Does asymptomatic left circumflex artery stenosis increase the risk of AF recurrence after persistent AF ablation in patients with no history of CAD?
Observational (n=496)
Yes
Does asymptomatic left circumflex artery stenosis increase the risk of AF recurrence after persistent AF ablation in patients with no history of CAD?
Hazard Ratio: 2.32 (95% CI 1.36–3.98)
Absolute Event Rate: 56% vs 32%
p-value: p=<0.01
Asymptomatic left circumflex artery stenosis detected by preprocedural CCT is associated with a significantly higher risk of AF recurrence after persistent AF ablation.
May inform pre-ablation risk stratification in persistent AF; leaves open prospective validation of CCT-guided interventions.
Background The pathophysiology of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. While several studies have demonstrated an association between myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation, the role of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) is still unknown. As a result, we aimed to assess the association between CAD obstruction and AF recurrence after persistent AF ablation in patients with no history of CAD. Materials and methods This observational retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent routine preprocedural cardiac computed tomography (CCT) before persistent AF ablation between September 2015 and June 2018 in 5 European University Hospitals. Exclusion criteria were CAD or coronary revascularization previously known or during follow-up. Obstructive CAD was defined as luminal stenosis ≥ 50%. Results All in all, 496 patients (mean age 61.8 ± 10.0 years, 76.2% males) were included. CHA 2 DS 2 –VASc score was 0 or 1 in 225 (36.3%) patients. Obstructive CAD was present in 86 (17.4%) patients. During the follow-up (24 ± 19 months), 207 (41.7%) patients had AF recurrence. The recurrence rate was not different between patients with and without obstructive CAD (43.0% vs. 41.5%, respectively; P = 0.79). When considering the location of the stenosis, the recurrence rate was higher in the case of left circumflex obstruction: 56% vs. 32% at 2 years (log-rank P ≤ 0.01). After Cox multivariate analysis, circumflex artery obstruction (HR 2.32; 95% CI 1.36–3.98; P < 0.01) was independently associated with AF recurrence. Conclusion Circumflex artery obstruction detected with CCT was independently associated with 2-fold increase in the risk of AF recurrence after persistent AF ablation. Further research is necessary to evaluate this pathophysiological relationship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garcia et al. (2022) conducted an observational in persistent atrial fibrillation (n=496). Left circumflex artery obstruction vs. No left circumflex artery obstruction was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation recurrence (HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.36-3.98, p=<0.01). Left circumflex artery obstruction detected by CCT was independently associated with a higher risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence after persistent AF ablation (HR 2.32; 95% CI 1.36-3.98; P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: