Key result
PFA achieves 100% durable mitral isthmus block with low major complications in persistent AF.
Why the study?
While pulsed-field ablation is safe and effective for pulmonary vein isolation in paroxysmal AF, evidence on targeting other left atrial substrates in persistent AF remains limited.
Does pulsed-field ablation for mitral isthmus combined with PVI and posterior wall isolation achieve sustained block and safety in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=130)
No
Does pulsed-field ablation for mitral isthmus combined with PVI and posterior wall isolation achieve sustained block and safety in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Pulsed-field ablation is a highly feasible and safe modality for achieving mitral isthmus block when combined with PVI and posterior wall isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports feasibility of pulsed-field ablation for mitral isthmus block; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized trials before practice change.
Introduction Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a novel ablation technology capable of selectively targeting myocardial tissue while sparing adjacent structures, thereby reducing complications associated with thermal ablation methods. Although PFA has demonstrated safety and efficacy for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), evidence regarding its use in other left atrial substrates in patients with persistent AF remains limited. Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of mitral isthmus (MI) ablation with PFA in combination with PVI and posterior wall (PW) isolation in patients with persistent AF. Methods This prospective, observational, single-center study included 130 patients (mean age: 60 years, 86% male) with persistent AF undergoing their first ablation with PFA between January 2022 and September 2024. The ablation strategy involved PVI, PW ablation, and MI ablation. The primary endpoints were feasibility, assessed by achieving a sustained MI block at the end of the procedure, and safety, based on the occurrence of major complications. Results A durable MI block after a 30-minute waiting period was achieved in all patients (100%). Only two complications were documented: a reversible case of acute kidney injury due to hemolysis and a femoral hematoma requiring surgical repair. No clinically significant coronary spasms were observed. After a mean follow-up of 289 days, a 24% recurrence rate was noted, including six cases of atrial flutter (five perimitral and one associated with the right pulmonary veins). Conclusion PFA appears to be a reliable and safe ablation method for MI ablation when combined with PVI in patients with persistent AF, demonstrating promising outcomes over a medium-term follow-up period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blasco et al. (2025) conducted an observational in persistent atrial fibrillation (n=130). Mitral isthmus ablation with pulsed-field ablation was evaluated on Feasibility (sustained mitral isthmus block at the end of the procedure) and safety (major complications). Mitral isthmus ablation with pulsed-field ablation achieved a durable block in 100% of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, with only two major complications.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: