Kinematic analysis reveals lower ACL injury risk in high-performance basketball players during COD maneuvers, suggesting training implications.
OBJECTIVES This study investigated the kinematic characteristics associated with high performance and a lower risk of anterior cruciate ligament injury during 90° change-of-direction (COD) maneuvers.METHODS While 34 male basketball players performed pre-planned 90° COD trials, kinematics were recorded using a 10-camera markerless motion capture system (120 Hz). Hip, knee, and trunk angles during weight acceptance were analyzed, as were center-of-mass velocities. Associations with knee abduction angle and completion time were tested with correlation analyses. Participants were subsequently stratified based on a composite score into the Fast & Low-Risk (F&L) and Slow & High-Risk (S&H) groups for between-group comparisons.RESULTS Knee abduction angle was correlated with trunk lateral flexion (r = −0.423), trunk rotation (r = −0.613), hip abduction (r = −0.589), and hip internal rotation (r = −0.637). Completion time was correlated with approach velocity (r = −0.640), exit velocity (r = −0.724), maximum running velocity (r = −0.479), and deceleration rate (r = 0.526). Compared with the S&H group, the F&L group were found to have smaller knee abduction angles (3.06 vs. 9.49°) and shorter completion times (1.50 vs. 1.68 s), with higher approach (5.38 vs. 4.58 m·s−¹) and exit (4.34 vs. 3.77 m·s−¹) velocities, lower deceleration rate (28.61 vs. 36.47%), less trunk extension (–17.69 vs. –21.57°), and greater trunk rotation (27.12 vs. 15.84°) toward the cutting direction. The maximum running velocities did not differ significantly among groups (6.20 vs. 6.05 m·s−¹).CONCLUSIONS For 90° COD, higher approach and exit velocities with limited velocity loss and trunk rotation toward the cutting direction were associated with shorter completion times and smaller knee abduction angles. These findings outline a movement strategy that might mitigate the traditional performance–injury tradeoff and guide training that emphasizes limitation of velocity loss and trunk–hip alignment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nishikawa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: