Key result
Transcatheter PVL closure achieves ~87% technical success, with mitral and mechanical prostheses increasing reintervention risk.
Why the study?
Data on long-term outcomes following transcatheter paravalvular leak closure are limited, and few prospective studies have explored predictive factors for morbidity and mortality.
Cohort (n=213)
Yes
Transcatheter PVL closure provides 66% survival without surgical reintervention at 2 years, though mitral involvement, mechanical prostheses, and hemolytic anemia increase the risk of adverse outcomes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports transcatheter PVL closure feasibility in selected patients; leaves open need for RCTs to guide practice.
Data on long-term outcomes following transcatheter paravalvular leak (PVL) closure are limited. Few prospective cohort studies have explored the predictive factors for morbidity and mortality in this procedure. This study aims to report the long-term outcomes of transcatheter PVL closure and identify factors associated with mortality or the need for surgical reintervention. This prospective registry (Fermeture de Fuite ParaProthétique, FFPP) included consecutive patients referred to 24 European centers for transcatheter PVL closure between 2017 and 2019. Predictive factors for mortality and surgical reintervention were analyzed over a two-year follow-up period. A total of 213 symptomatic patients who underwent 237 procedures were included. Mean age was 68 years (±11), with a median EUROSCORE II of 6 [4–10]. Targeted PVL was mitral in 64.6% of cases, with mechanical valves in 50.6%. Heart failure was present in 89.5%, and/or hemolytic anemia in 49.8%. Transapical access was used in 6.8% of cases. Technical success was achieved in 87.3% of procedures, with clinical success at 1 month in 70.5% of patients. At 2 years, survival without surgical reintervention was 66%, 95%CI [60.07- 72.69]. Multivariate analysis identified mitral PVL involvement (OR 1.92 [1.03–3.70]; p=0.041), mechanical prostheses (OR 1.88 [1.12–3.22]; p=0.017), hemolytic anemia (OR 1.96 [1.17–3.29]; p=0.010) and transapical (OR 1.91 [0.98–3.75]; p=0.059) as risk markers. Transcatheter PVL closure is an effective and safe procedure for symptomatic patients with an intermediate/high EUROSCORE II risk. However, at 2 years post-procedure, mortality and the need for surgical reintervention remain significant challenges, with mitral valve involvement, mechanical prosthesis, hemolytic anemia and apical access identified as key predictive factors
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Albenque et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Paravalvular leak (n=213). Transcatheter paravalvular leak closure was evaluated on survival without surgical reintervention (95% CI 60.07-72.69). Transcatheter paravalvular leak closure resulted in a 2-year survival without surgical reintervention of 66% (95% CI 60.07-72.69), with mitral involvement and mechanical prostheses as risk markers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: