Key result
Intracoronary imaging guidance shows no procedural success benefit over angiography in lithotripsy-assisted PCI.
Why the study?
Does intracoronary imaging-guided PCI with intravascular lithotripsy improve procedural success and clinical outcomes compared to angiography-guided PCI with intravascular lithotripsy in patients with coronary artery calcification?
Cohort (n=509)
Yes
Does intracoronary imaging-guided PCI with intravascular lithotripsy improve procedural success and clinical outcomes compared to angiography-guided PCI with intravascular lithotripsy in patients with coronary artery calcification?
Absolute Event Rate: 89.7% vs 88.7%
p-value: p=0.71
Intracoronary imaging-guided PCI with intravascular lithotripsy achieves similar procedural success and long-term safety as angiography-guided PCI, despite being utilized for significantly more complex calcified lesions.
Background Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is an innovative treatment for coronary artery calcification (CAC). However, the impact of intracoronary imaging (ICI)-guidance PCI, as compared to angiography-guided PCI, in combination with IVL, has not been specifically investigated. Purpose This study aimed to compare the procedural and clinical outcomes of ICI-guided PCI combined with IVL versus angiography-guided PCI with IVL in patients with CAC. Methods This retrospective study analyzed 509 patients from a multicenter registry (May 2019–September 2024). Angiography-guided PCI with IVL was defined as therapy under solely fluoroscopic guidance. ICI-guided IVL was defined as PCI treated with IVL with concomitant use of ICI for procedural guidance. The primary endpoint was procedural success, defined as a composite of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 flow, residual stenosis <30%, and absence of in-hospital events. Safety endpoints included procedural complications and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) up to two-year follow-up. Results A total of 537 lesions were treated with IVL: 252 (46.9%) with angiography-guided PCI and 285 (53.1%) with ICI-guided PCI. The ICI-guided group treated more complex lesions, including a higher prevalence of aorto-ostial lesions (20.2% vs. 30.9%; p=0.005), chronic total occlusions (CTOs) (2.8% vs. 12.3%; p=0.001), and long-segment disease (58.7% vs. 69.5%; p=0.009). Larger IVL balloon diameters were used more frequently (3.0–3.5 mm vs. 3.5–4.0 mm; p<0.001), along with pre-IVL rotational atherectomy (9.5% vs. 16.1%; p=0.02), post-dilatation (89.7% vs. 96.1%; p=0.006), and stent implantation (71.8% vs. 81.1%; p=0.01) in the ICI-guided group. Post-PCI quantitative coronary analysis showed significantly larger minimum lumen diameter (2.73 ± 0.60 mm vs. 3.07 ± 0.68 mm; p<0.001) in the ICI-guided group. Procedural success was comparable between groups (88.7% vs. 89.7%; p=0.71), with similar complication rates (4.6% vs. 8.1%; p=0.14). One-year follow-up data were available for 346 patients (68% of the cohort), and two-year follow-up data were available for 220 patients (43.2%). MACE rates were comparable between groups at one-year (angiography-guided: 8.2% vs. ICI-guided: 14.7%; p=0.28) and two-year follow-up (15.4% vs. 15.6%; p=0.46). Follow-up duration was significantly longer in the angiography-guided group (510.5 vs. 365 days; p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no significant differences in cumulative event-free survival at one- and two-year follow-up (p=0.18 and p=0.16, respectively). Conclusion In this real-world multicenter study, procedural success and complication rates were similar between angiography-guided and ICI-guided PCI with IVL. MACE rates at one- and two-year follow-up were also comparable. However, in the ICI-guided group more complex target lesions were treated, and different treatment strategies were performed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Phagu et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery calcification (n=509). Intracoronary imaging-guided PCI with intravascular lithotripsy vs. Angiography-guided PCI with intravascular lithotripsy was evaluated on Procedural success (composite of TIMI 3 flow, residual stenosis <30%, and absence of in-hospital events) (p=0.71). Intracoronary imaging-guided PCI with intravascular lithotripsy yielded similar procedural success compared to angiography-guided PCI (89.7% vs. 88.7%; p=0.71) despite treating more complex lesions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: