Key result
IVL procedural complications are linked to a 43% one-year MACE rate compared to uncomplicated cases.
Why the study?
Intravascular lithotripsy has emerged for coronary artery calcification, but the incidence of complications, clinical outcomes, and predictors of complications in real-world cohorts required evaluation.
What are the clinical outcomes and predictors of complications after coronary intravascular lithotripsy?
Observational (n=509)
Yes
What are the clinical outcomes and predictors of complications after coronary intravascular lithotripsy?
Absolute Event Rate: 43% vs 9%
p-value: p=<0.001
In a real-world registry, complications following coronary IVL were uncommon (6%) but were associated with significantly higher one-year MACE, primarily driven by in-hospital events.
Complications after coronary IVL were associated with higher one-year MACE; supports consensus on procedural risks but leaves causal impact open.
Background Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has emerged as a percutaneous treatment option for coronary artery calcification (CAC). Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of complications associated with IVL-therapy, to assess clinical outcomes and to identify predictors of complications in a real-world patient cohort. Methods Patients who underwent IVL between May 2019 and September 2024 were enrolled from an ongoing international, all-comers IVL-registry. Patients were categorized based on the presence or absence of complications following IVL and concomitant therapy. The primary endpoints were achievement of residual diameter stenosis <30% on quantitative coronary analysis (QCA) and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at one-year follow-up. MACE was defined as occurrence of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization (TVR). Kaplan-Meier and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to compare outcomes and to identify predictors of complications. Results The study included 509 patients (73±9 years, 75% male). 219 (43%) patients presented with acute coronary syndrome and 290 (57%) with chronic coronary syndrome, and were comparable between groups (p=0.424). Complications occurred in 33 (6%), of which 6 (1%) were directly IVL-related. The most frequent complications were flow-limiting coronary dissections (n=9, 2%), hemodynamic instability (n=9, 2%) and coronary perforations (n=7, 1%). These were effectively managed with 30 interventions, leading to favorable procedural outcomes. Among patients with complications and available QCA data, residual diameter stenosis <30% was achieved in 28 of 29 lesions (97%). One-year cumulative MACE was 11% (39 patients) and was significantly higher in patients with complications (n=9, 43% vs. n=30, 9%; p<0.001). This difference was primarily driven by in-hospital MACE, which occurred in 10 patients overall (2%); 6 (18%) in patients with complications and 4 (1%) in patients without complications (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis identified larger pre-dilatation balloon diameters as a significant predictor of complications (p=0.032). Conclusion In this real-world registry, complications following IVL and concomitant therapy were uncommon, with an even lower rate of IVL-related complications. Patients with procedural complications had a significantly higher one-year MACE rate, primarily due to in-hospital events. Larger pre-dilatation balloon diameters were a significant predictor of complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oort et al. (2025) conducted an observational in coronary artery calcification (CAC) (n=509). Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) vs. Patients without complications was evaluated on Achievement of residual diameter stenosis <30% on QCA and incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at one-year follow-up (p=<0.001). Procedural complications following intravascular lithotripsy occurred in 6% of patients and were associated with a significantly higher one-year MACE rate compared to those without complications (43% vs 9%; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: