Key result
LDL-C target attainment in Japanese secondary prevention patients rises to ~35% by 2022.
Why the study?
It remained unclear whether LDL-C treatment target attainment rates are trending upward in secondary prevention and what factors associate with attainment under Japanese guidelines.
Observational (n=184,870)
No
Absolute Event Rate: 34.7% vs 24.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
LDL-C target attainment in Japanese secondary prevention patients has improved over time but remains low at 34.7% in 2022, highlighting the need for more intensive treatments, particularly in women.
Attainment remains suboptimal in Japanese secondary prevention; supports consensus on gradual improvement but leaves open strategies to address persistent gaps.
Background According to the latest Japanese Guidelines for the Prevention of Atherosclerotic Disease in 2022, the target for secondary prevention of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with a history of coronary heart disease is LDL-C <100 mg/dL, and in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), diabetes, or atherothrombotic stroke is LDL-C <70 mg/dL. However, it is still unclear 1) if the LDL-C treatment target attainment rates are in upward trend, and 2) what are the factors associated with LDL-C treatment target attainment. Aims We aimed to investigate 1) trends of LDL-C treatment target attainment rates and 2) factors associated with LDL-C treatment target attainment in the general population of Japan. Methods Using the Health Checkup data in our city obtained in 2008(n=38,546), 2012(n=45,719), 2017(n=51,969), and 2022(n=48,636) when the Japanese Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Diseases had been revised, we analyzed 1) the trends of secondary prevention of LDL-C treatment target attainment rates in patients with a history of heart disease by Cochran-Armitage trend test. Additionally, we analyzed 2) factors associated with LDL-C treatment target attainment by logistic regression analysis using patient basic variables, blood test results, and lifestyle questionnaires from the 2022 health examination. Results The LDL-C treatment target attainment rates were 24.6% in 2008, 30.2% in 2012, 33.0% in 2017, and 34.7% in 2022. We found that there was a significantly upward trend over time (P<0.001). Nextly, we also found that, male sex (odds ratio[OR]: 2.64, 95% confidence interval[CI]: 1.72-4.06, P<0.001), systolic blood pressure (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98-1.00, P=0.015), ALT (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.03, P=0.044), uric acid (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.72-0.88, P<0.001), use of medication to reduce blood pressure (OR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.48-2.49, P<0.001), use of medication to reduce blood sugar or insulin injection (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.24-0.58, P<0.001), weight gain of 10 kg or more since age 20 (OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.53-0.93, P=0.015), walking or any equivalent amount of physical activity for more than one hour a day in daily life (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57-0.92, P=0.009), and eating speed quicker than others (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.03-1.67, P=0.027), were significantly associated with LDL-C treatment target attainment. Conclusions The LDL-C treatment target attainment rates among Japanese patients under secondary prevention tended to increase over time. However, there are several clinical as well as lifestyle factors associated with LDL-C treatment target attainment. Interventions for specific lifestyles and more intensive treatments for women should be considered to achieve better LDL-C control among patients with preexisting coronary heart disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Furukawa et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (secondary prevention) (n=184,870). Guideline-directed lipid-lowering therapy vs. Historical control (2008 vs 2022) was evaluated on LDL-C treatment target attainment rate (p=<0.001). LDL-C treatment target attainment rates among Japanese patients under secondary prevention significantly increased from 24.6% in 2008 to 34.7% in 2022 (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: